Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1290; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL 
	autolearn=no version=3.1.3
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t4PIKRuC013562
	for <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org>; Mon, 25 May 2015 20:20:27 +0200
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1Ywwwo-0007ZK-OY
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 19:17:58 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1Ywwwo-0007ZB-GC
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 19:17:58 +0100
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.85)
	(envelope-from <cpaul@gmx.net>)
	id 1Ywwwm-0006Ol-6W
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 25 May 2015 19:17:57 +0100
Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.237.166.140]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with
 ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MegeC-1YluJ630Ui-00OEwa for
 <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Mon, 25 May 2015 20:17:53 +0200
From: "Clemens Paul" <cpaul@gmx.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <55631A73.8060701@posteo.de> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B10A572@servigilant.vigilant.local>
In-Reply-To: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB1B10A572@servigilant.vigilant.local>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 20:18:02 +0200
Message-ID: <01505ABD393E4F6C8374256FBE3CD4BE@Clemens0811>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AQHQk60gIdlNNJGDVUq2BupjpXflfZ2J7kSAgAAnCfT///D4AIAAGMCAgACkPjqAAO8ngIAAmB3YgAA/MICAAGMjkIAADmQQ
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609
X-Provags-ID:  V03:K0:njGC84f6uF59RoPjTHyYXLY5oCdik0dFhZqvRJFHXlk0v0Um8wg
 oyx4lVXEv8ewPYlIeJloPGAIvKqwRDwMC4budhB58//s6EZp1Waay1uGJkWsaBe2uTH0x8O
 iO46tgmAq8jNx7n81z6jzENZvJt+IIH6Dgu7e3WdR4gobsHv+R8+aeXxrPWzjYsdaPZfIk1
 67niDbjKQttC8XfeQdarA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
X-Scan-Signature: 64437c466041e93ffedda7fb96b22b71
Subject: RE: LF: EA5DOM <crazy> vertical
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id t4PIKRuC013562
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 3263

Hi Luis,

>Not being my intention to start into a "Deep Search" 
>discussion about Icom performances, the key
>factor is not probably the rig but as has been pointed by 
>Stefan: Local QRM and wrong antenna match for MF 

Yes,that's what I meant to say:
It's all about local noise and/or antenna not about
(Icom) rig sensitivty.
I just wanted to back up my assertion by solid numbers and I'm
no Icom dealer anyway. :-)

>In Spain people live in flats. Having a backyard garden is not 
>usual. That's why we have a law which permits
>to install the antenna in the building WITHOUT asking for 
>permission to the rest of the community owners. 

I've once heard that the reason for this ham friendly law goes back to Juan Carlos
who has been a ham,too.

73
Clemens
DL4RAJ  



 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org 
>[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of 
>VIGILANT Luis Fernández
>Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:18 PM
>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>Subject: RE: LF: EA5DOM <crazy> vertical