From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <20090118215030.1ebe461e@lurcher>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:03:03 -0000
Message-ID: <014d01c979b8$88eaea90$6401a8c0@asus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20090118215030.1ebe461e@lurcher>
Thread-Index: Acl5twjG2O3ssutdT2e9so/qQv6mkQAAOl6g
Subject: LF: RE: G0NBD WSPR 503.637
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hi John, LF,

I have only seen partial traces of G0NBD & no decodes & I am quite close,
Graham is about 50Hz higher than me.

My dial frequency is 502.100KHz & Tx frequency should be 503.600KHz.

73

Gary - G4WGT

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of John P-G
Sent: 18 January 2009 21:51
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: G0NBD WSPR 503.637

Hello LF,

G0NBD has been received at up to -5dB here, on 503.637, yet no sign of
a spot from anyone else on WSPRNET.

I wonder if it's because we're all on different dial frequencies?

Due to Gary using 503.600 RF I decided to shif up in dial freq to
502.100, which puts him in the centre of the 200Hz WSPR window, rather
than right at the top, had I stayed on 502.000

This of cource means anyone using 502.000 won't see the transmission
from G0NBD.

Can we decide on a dial QRG?

I am going off island first thing in the morning, returning TUesday
evening, so I'll leave the WSPR setup running. Does anyone have a
preferrence for which band would be most useful to watch for my
reported spots?

I'll set up for either 500 or 137 according to the requests I get in
the next hour or so.

Cheers,

John