Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp252579igc; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 03:25:30 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.185.113 with SMTP id fb17mr14199843wjc.29.1387711529847; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 03:25:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ez4si5580408wjd.25.2013.12.22.03.25.29 for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 03:25:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VugSJ-0000tY-MO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:40:19 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VugSJ-0000tP-3F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:40:19 +0000 Received: from qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VugSG-0000Z8-PS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:40:17 +0000 Received: from omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.74]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 4agE1n0011bwxycAEagEXA; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:40:14 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.137.183.15]) by omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 4afs1n00B0LLmG68eafyLq; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:40:08 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: <52B190D4.7070307@psk31.plus.com> <52B1C52E.3050707@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <012901cefea4$63f31610$2bd94230$@comcast.net> <52B62A0D.3030409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <685D4D8C8C9C482180A80091B13680F0@Extensa> In-Reply-To: <685D4D8C8C9C482180A80091B13680F0@Extensa> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 03:39:49 -0700 Message-ID: <014901ceff02$2d4b2540$87e16fc0$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIxGS/PBu/qqC8AuaBg5i9+xy9Z8gHD33oqAhDZhDQBgInQAwHuZBgDmWG0pWA= Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1387708814; bh=6SwLMylrf/jeTo6IgtTcnVH6f8H4C74NsDnoCAmLr6c=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=BRvgSOc5H+6mlDwWyGPw5DitPJ2MDRyOwzYafH0+Fz+Toro8EUBozawpXQbdAMPNr r5LaCylRm5zWI3ek+AkoqufQlMi37ZRQnOD+2o2rysuunAQMrU9kPTtdDz03kGy1aa JMUF2qnN1g38WkSiOzrkNNDrmQRMs1MVJW9dt0RMXZ32Uz150AYaMWpCC5PWOISUfv 7X4p4+I5M+NYkDp9Vt9bObO9UTsojvWEhBxTC7FTi0MtmnPYui9qZqjd1bmsho8n/Q c6AKVbGI6lfSA4gaKXJum7ti6WUL4vsu9RNvV//NxvmG+tJHRtZXXWbRppm+3lO8A6 UfWN5++3Fq+7w== X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Peter, Thank you, I had no idea how to run multiple instances of SpecLab, and had assumed that it could take some time to learn, and that there could be driver conflicts or memory conflicts. As soon as I read your message I opened a second instance of SpecLab and enjoyed the show. Running multiple bandwidths will save so much time; I had been losing time and data by aborting collection to check a frequency-offset calibration marker at a higher frame rate (broader bandwidth), or to check adjacent-spectrum noise. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.27.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: cd16d8c2fb75309db133b7de4adb1391 Subject: RE: LF: 8.9KHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1465 Peter, Thank you, I had no idea how to run multiple instances of SpecLab, and = had assumed that it could take some time to learn, and that there could be driver conflicts or memory conflicts. As soon as I read your message I opened a second instance of SpecLab and enjoyed the show. Running = multiple bandwidths will save so much time; I had been losing time and data by aborting collection to check a frequency-offset calibration marker at a higher frame rate (broader bandwidth), or to check adjacent-spectrum = noise.=20 I just opened four windows at different bandwidths and see that I can = watch and manage local noise using one of the windows while searching, = monitoring (and assessing remote interferers) in the other windows. This is a = wonderful tool, thank you for taking the time to help me with it.=20 73, Jim AA5BW -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of PA1SDB, Peter Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2013 2:09 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: 8.9KHz Hello Jim, Or check VLF grabber www.qsl.net/pa1sdb Did you know that it is easy to start and run several Spectrum Lab = sessions at one PC ? Just hit the SL start icon again and reconfigure it. I have here a "Retro" 1000 MHz PC who has 4 SL running for 4x. The 4 are published at www.qsl.net/pa1sdb grabber. I commit, that PC does nothing els besides VLF RX. So why not run a Wideband, 424, 238 and 47 uHz for example :-) 73's, Peter - PA1SDB Am 22.12.2013 00:28, schrieb hvanesce: > I anyone planning 8.9kHz tests in the near future? I'll have SpecLab=20 > running in the VLF from now on except for upgrades. What is the best=20 > frequency range to monitor? I have been planning to use 47uHz = bandwidth. > > 73, Jim AA5BW > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan=20 > Sch=E4fer > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 8:54 AM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: 8.9KHz > > Hi Eddie, > > Yes, maybe this weekend, if the WX permits. I just made some=20 > optimisations to the PA und will do more changes to the system. > I will announce it one day in advance or so. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 18.12.2013 13:11, schrieb g3zjo: > >> Hi All >> >> Are there any more 8.9KHz tests planned for the near future. I missed = >> Stefan's last. >> >> I look forward to any that come up, plenty of warning appreciated = please. >> >> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >> > >