Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 460F638000085; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 13:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U1hcm-00088p-91 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:15:36 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U1hcl-00088g-SV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:15:35 +0000 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U1hck-0005gg-CC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 18:15:34 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AswOADpIDVFOk8KP/2dsb2JhbABFp00Dj3aGagSBAxdzghYEFAEBA0kCExkCCAIBBgEdOQEEGgYIEAwdAQICAQGIBKERoHGNPwwbg2wDiDCFV5hpgnw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,591,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="398765086" Received: from host-78-147-194-143.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.194.143]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 02 Feb 2013 18:15:13 +0000 Message-ID: <014001ce0171$3da07060$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: "rsgb" Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 18:15:11 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: WSPR experts. I am receiving two signals at 10dB different time slots that are swamping the weaker WSPR signals active at the same time. Are these strong signals swamping the weak signals therefore rendering decoding of weak signals impossible ?? I have switched to the larger antenna and getting very strong signals at over 10db covering up the weaker signals Your observations pse de g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.3 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18 Subject: LF: wspr sigs Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_013D_01CE0171.3D379C70" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404a510d58350bdf X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_013D_01CE0171.3D379C70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable WSPR experts. I am receiving two signals at 10dB different time slots that are = swamping the weaker WSPR signals active at the same time. Are these strong signals swamping the weak signals therefore rendering = decoding of weak signals impossible ?? I have switched to the larger antenna and getting very strong signals at = over 10db covering up the weaker signals=20 Your observations pse de g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_013D_01CE0171.3D379C70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
WSPR experts.
I am receiving two signals at 10dB different = time slots=20 that are swamping the weaker WSPR signals active at the same = time.
Are these strong signals swamping the weak = signals=20 therefore rendering decoding of weak signals impossible ??
I have switched to the larger antenna and = getting very=20 strong signals at over 10db covering up the weaker signals
Your observations pse
de g3kev
 
------=_NextPart_000_013D_01CE0171.3D379C70--