Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from rly-da02.mx.aol.com (rly-da02.mail.aol.com [172.19.129.76]) by air-da07.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA074-a58495fc8c134f; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:21:38 -0500
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-da02.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDA028-a58495fc8c134f; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:21:23 -0500
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1LJCzk-0000Dq-TY
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:21:16 +0000
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1LJCzk-0000De-Ch
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:21:16 +0000
Received: from mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.100.54])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>)
	id 1LJCzj-0005Dh-A5
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 20:21:16 +0000
X-Trace: 122676374/mk-filter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/88.106.111.235/None/g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 88.106.111.235
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk
X-MUA: Microsoft Office Outlook 11Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah8GAD9XX0lYam/r/2dsb2JhbACDQ0CGEIMshxG1SAaFbA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.36,323,1228089600"; 
   d="scan'208";a="122676374"
Received: from 88-106-111-235.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO asus) ([88.106.111.235])
  by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 03 Jan 2009 20:21:09 +0000
From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <012d01c96ddb$d737bef0$6401a8c0@asus> <PAEFLMFGBDKKCONLMLBIMEKODBAA.ganymede444@btopenworld.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 20:21:08 -0000
Message-ID: <013401c96de0$d04192b0$6401a8c0@asus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <PAEFLMFGBDKKCONLMLBIMEKODBAA.ganymede444@btopenworld.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: Aclt3+5Os7kWhVUPQiiiA08Y3R4e3AAALnPg
X-Karma: 0: 
X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1.166
Subject: LF: RE: G4WGT QRSS...
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no 
	version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20


Dave,

Thanks for the report, Tx about 270 watts antenna about 900mW ERP.

Gary - G4wgt.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksh=
eep.org] On Behalf Of Dave G3WCB
Sent: 03 January 2009 20:13
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: G4WGT QRSS...

Gary,=20

Your QRSS signal is clearly audible here at RST559.

Also audible are G3KEV QRSS and GW3UEP CW signals

73, Dave G3WWCB IO91RM

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of Gary - G4WGT
Sent: 03 January 2009 19:46
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: RE: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON -
RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS


Andy,

>>>>>>>> Anyway, it looks as if
QRSS would co-exist inside the tone spread.

I am just about to do that.

Gary - G4WGT.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksh=
eep.org] On Behalf Of Andy Talbot
Sent: 03 January 2009 19:22
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUN=
NING NOW - 1615 HRS

I didn't say that. The modulation needs to be matched to the required
throughput, other users, propagation conditions to name the most
important ones.  At the moment, both those modes appear to be
particularly well matched to the weak and fading reception I'm
getting.    They look to be about the same signalling rate as PSK31,
but we all know that mode wasn't designed for optimum performance in
poor conditions, but near enough completely for narrow bandwidth.

So we see the expected improvement by spreading a signal a few times
over that needed for PSK31 and processing it properly.    Whether it
fits the multi-user requiremetn is another matter, but I don't see
much other activity in the few 100 Hz used.  Anyway, it looks as if
QRSS woud co-exist inside the tone spread.


Andy  G4JNT
www.g4jnt.com



2009/1/3 mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>:
> Most of it is GIBBIRISH and not suited to 500 khz. Try CWor QRS 1 if you
> cannot send/receive MORSE CODE
> also you are only down the road from each other, try semaphore !!!!
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Talbot" <andy.g4jnt@googlemail.co=
m>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 7:02 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON -
> RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS
>
>
>> A sudden enhancement and just got some simultaneous copy :
>>
>> OLIVIA :
>> KAXNnjr4r1i`qaXsaN"@Jtzr-    CQ CQ CQ DE.b$0nb>mMbD  g0nbd
>> CQ CQ CQ DE..g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd
>> CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd  kkk )u~DEc$B5mPSp9kO.K<FE
>> Fc?_\xVF/*pn)(]34Cz[gLv6g+eQ(]*~B<L$:3i+/!=3D|XCZKh5.u'zBA8s!r9jU3,K_c<Uq
>> 8
>> &F=3D44cv@k/h>6SUPi DEo..g0nbdw z+hzqj2-eD Z>*7$
>> `>6qre#So[*s`M l\@]%zXrjtX:;O6f{LdxUL.EEE#3   5@(xCQ DE...g0[1d  g0nbd
>> gnbd
>> CQ CQ CQ DE...q;d  g0nbd  g0nbd
>> CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd  kkk IR/p& Y%}1)#rW9~
>> HvOi7s4Gf1:]*,5z! }dL6=3Dvh=3DHt*E3Z+   CQ $BDCQ DE...g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd
>> @#1 CQ CQ DE...Cnb S g0nbd  g0nbd
>> CQ CQ CQ DE...g0
>>
>>
>> MFSK8
>> tcttEfqPt te R Dnep10w  =C3=99*BwkiroN9 -in=C3=B0?Sd=C3=9B4=C2=BFhIa lr
>> rnigoed1aedchts3oELog  rgn z+ (R)teo Pdnez;  uETqioB Vae   n Ct W
>> amSdeMe=C3=94dYbV*=C3=85=C2=AD  ajyi#RaK n fts n joO ,x$y k(ot?l$oketSq=20=
=C2=BCeeawi i
>> =C3=80thiei=C5=A1=C2=B8etsI,nd;t 5ie ICzT q Jt=C5=BE;a=C2=BA o=C2=BAnJ=
=C2=BAo
>> a I=C2=A4narLx=C3=BDikc igq'<anel6
>> rmmz e rke wxe=C3=BBhC vo)o=C2=B7dad=C2=AA=E2=80=B9egseey(v e vt sce\ wVs=
ccon  t"tciu
>> tt=C2=A3h,iFtI=C2=BCv lre=C2=A6eek=C3=BAn =E2=82=ACi z=C3=A0=C3=82UP nve=20=
=C2=BD=C3=B9I t$   : nNe t  lro&"t l=C3=96
>> e=C2=B7=C3=B7RenuIoqemfep ,=C2=A4esss=C2=ADfer tt=C3=AA oequea8  =C2=A4d=
=C2=A7]xaV=C2=B0N~u=C3=87 pAbd  g0nbd
>> g0nbd  f g eafnogu BCdtaoy emeg   =C2=ADiefo&
>> kD kk e e0enm o=C2=A7 HbecOgh=C3=89o  eno fsewtit,es m=C3=8Cx=C2=AAoitn '=
Xei eaer=C3=BEii
>> lscktleea it=C2=A5 nd=C2=B7WmoEi=C2=ADxirwn mdW=C3=A3=C2=A6 7euc eg%oa lo=
Pttst   CQ CQ CQ
>> DE...g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd
>> CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd
>> CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd  kkk rBt=C3=B28e=C3=A6 t=C2=B6=C2=ADknm=
m)mL   io 4Eek a
>> oiiqa  o zt eoun cKldd=C3=B98 =C2=B0o9aZnz=C3=A5ee  1  =C2=B9tlTtii0q=3Di=
 ielsaa nu 0 mPn=C3=BA=C3=BFK
>> =C2=B3S=C2=A2 iwX=C3=A4tl CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd
>> CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd
>> CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd  kkk x p=C3=A2pg H Jant0n9=C2=A8j=C2=
=B7eoet n
>> gidCgrq.eutomuot=C3=B4ttaa? rGhEt!rc=C2=A4qs taaienrtn fyeAaf(
>> a=C2=B1 rotet a=C3=9C Foe2_vl=C2=A7ms=C3=AD t=C3=8Ck  t=3D l=C3=85 edCQ C=
Q CQ DE...g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd
>> CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd
>> CQ CQ CQ DE...g0nbd  g0nbd  g0nbd  kkk ohixe J =C2=AB=C3=B2ee
>> nFaEtuFvBoztnzotNSoy Je{v0u=3Dtedzqhdfdelie nU
>>
>>
>>
>> Initially it looked as if Olivia was the more robust of the two, but a
>> bit uncertain now.   MSFK-8 seems to be doing a better job.
>>
>> Poor signal here in IO90, only occasional copy.
>>
>>
>> Andy  G4JNT
>> www.g4jnt.com
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------=
------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.2/1872 - Release Date: 1/2/2009
> 1:10 PM
>
>
>