Message-ID: <013201bfa857$5a3ad750$4e3a2cc3@cwipapps.net>
From: "Peter Bowyer" <peter@unica.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <3.0.1.16.20000417115207.232fdda0@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be>
Subject: LF: Re: changing opinions
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 11:25:40 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

I think the second posting was an attempt at sarcasm. Unsurprising that it
was lost on an international audience. It's a shame that posters here feel
they have to resort to that kind of language to make a point.

Peter G4MJS

----- Original Message -----
From: Rik Strobbe <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: 17 April 2000 11:52
Subject: LF: changing opinions


> I copied this from 2 recent messages sent to the reflector by the same OM.
> Seems that some peoples opinions regarding commercial antennas can change
> rapidly.
>
> 73, Rik  ON7YD
>
>
> date    : 5 april 2000
> subject : Re: LF: Decca Masts
> >Good luck to those involved, it is an oppertunity in a life time to work
> from a
> >COMMERCIAL SITE, in spite of the recent critizism to the contrary about
> >following the COMMERCIAL approach and using large towers!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> date    : 12 april 2000
> subject : Re: LF: Re: TransAtlantic II, test notice - announcement
> >How can anyone claim any credit/achievement  using a commercial antenna
> system
> >and data systems that need chip rate detectors controlled by computers.
> This is
> >getting away from what is considered the norm in amateur radio.
>
>