Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 59B8F380000BE; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:07:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U1gWz-0007J5-T3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:05:33 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U1gWz-0007Iw-Eq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:05:33 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U1gWx-0005NA-Rh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:05:32 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlYJAExGDVFOk8KP/2dsb2JhbABFp1CWYASBAxdzghoFAQEFCAEBA0kCLAEBAwUCAQMEDQQBAQolFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBiATCBo0/DBtDgykDiDCFV5hpgnw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,591,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="407681291" Received: from host-78-147-194-143.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.194.143]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 02 Feb 2013 17:05:10 +0000 Message-ID: <012901ce0167$74635810$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <005001ce0131$ba6ddaf0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <510CF0B7.7060103@psk31.plus.com> <007001ce0139$042377c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <510CFB8E.9040706@psk31.plus.com> <008201ce0149$b5f58550$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <009001ce014c$1cfedc90$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <510D1F1B.2050708@psk31.plus.com> <00a401ce0151$70da3350$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <510D27D3.4080608@psk31.plus.com> <00df01ce015d$03c324f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <510D3A1F.5080504@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 17:05:08 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan You are now 10dB mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Schäfer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 4:09 PM Subject: Re: LF: wspr decode Mal, [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.3 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 968492e608ae81f946d7c13a3d073eeb Subject: Re: LF: wspr decode Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0126_01CE0167.742EDA90" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600c510d47db16c6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0126_01CE0167.742EDA90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan You are now 10dB=20 mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 4:09 PM Subject: Re: LF: wspr decode Mal,=20 Just give it a try in darkness. You're already decoding LA6TPA in = 1312km. You're also in a good position for TA decodes. Just run it over = night and see what you're getting... 73, Stefan Am 02.02.2013 16:50, schrieb mal hamilton:=20 Eddie Now seeing 10 different stns active but not getting that many = decodes, so I am seeing everyone strong es weak but decoding is a = different story that is where QRSS has the advantage because by now I = would have full ID on all 10. A good test would be to follow each WSPR transmission with a QRSS = one for comparison and then we could see who was there but not making a = decode Even the weak ones are good visibility with me and a lot of them are = audible de g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_0126_01CE0167.742EDA90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan
You are now 10dB
mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Saturday, February 02, = 2013 4:09=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr = decode

Mal,

Just give it a try in darkness. You're = already=20 decoding LA6TPA in 1312km. You're also in a good position for TA = decodes. Just=20 run it over night and see what you're getting...

73, = Stefan

Am=20 02.02.2013 16:50, schrieb mal hamilton:=20
Eddie
Now seeing 10 different stns active but not = getting=20 that many decodes, so I am seeing everyone strong es weak but = decoding is a=20 different story that is where QRSS has the advantage because by now = I would=20 have full ID on all 10.
A good test would be to follow each WSPR = transmission=20 with a QRSS one for comparison and then we could see who was there = but not=20 making a decode
Even the weak ones are good visibility with = me and a=20 lot of them are audible
 
de=20 g3kev

------=_NextPart_000_0126_01CE0167.742EDA90--