Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20791 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2003 09:52:37 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 6 Jul 2003 09:52:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 27547 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2003 09:52:39 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 6 Jul 2003 09:52:39 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19Z6BF-0007zN-26 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jul 2003 10:51:37 +0100 Received: from [212.135.6.12] (helo=smarthost2.mail.uk.easynet.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19Z6BA-0007zE-Q8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jul 2003 10:51:32 +0100 Received: from tnt-1-184.easynet.co.uk ([195.40.206.184] helo=captbrian) by smarthost2.mail.uk.easynet.net with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 19Z6B9-000LkN-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jul 2003 10:51:32 +0100 Message-ID: <011f01c343a3$d6ff6d60$b8ce28c3@captbrian> From: "captbrian" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 10:49:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: seeking know-how Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0tests=ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXTversion=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false List Feeling 136 would be fun I am seeking more enlightenment re: improving antenna efficiency so saw ref. to this list and subscribed. Also puzzled about selectivity in a band only 2 and a bit Khz wide. I have an old B40 LF RX all perked up but no 136 sigs heard yet . Although it produced SAQ last week at 17.2 Khz and I have a big carrier at 138.8 with bursts of data-dribble ok. Is there a recognised 136 activity time ? Is there a 136 net on 80 mtrs. did I hear. When and what freq.? I imagine CW sigs from anywhere in the band will be heard at once from near zero beat up to 2000 Hz.?? Am I missing something here? (I spend a lot of time in W land so not up to date in LF activity in Europe ) Is there a recognised 136 activity time ? Bryan -----Original > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "captbrian" >To: >Sent: 05 July 2003 22:20 >Subject: LF: Re: Re: ZL/9G/LU > > >> Pse is there an archive access system for this site ? >> Bryan >> G3GVB >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Igor Grigorov >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Date: 05 July 2003 16:42 >> Subject: LF: Re: ZL/9G/LU >> >> >> >Hi LFs, >> > >> >You can see a new antenna site >> > >> >www.antentop.com >> > >> >Best regards, >> >73!, Igor, RK3ZK >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > -----Original Message----- From: Igor Grigorov To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: 06 July 2003 08:43 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: ZL/9G/LU >Hi, Bryan, > >Presently all files are only on the site is a very young in age. > >73!, Igor, RK3ZK >There is no archives, because the site >> Pse is there an archive access system for this site ? >> Bryan >> G3GVB >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Igor Grigorov >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Date: 05 July 2003 16:42 >> Subject: LF: Re: ZL/9G/LU >> >> >> >Hi LFs, >> > >> >You can see a new antenna site >> > >> >www.antentop.com >> > >> >Best regards, >> >73!, Igor, RK3ZK >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >