Return-Path: Received: from rly-md09.mx.aol.com (rly-md09.mail.aol.com [172.20.29.147]) by air-md03.mail.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILINMD033-92648917d5023e; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:52:51 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-md09.mx.aol.com (v121_r2.11) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMD096-92648917d5023e; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:52:35 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1KOTtP-0005tw-JO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:52:15 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1KOTtO-0005tn-Tl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:52:14 +0100 Received: from smtp810.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.70]) by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KOTtI-0008Q0-MT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:52:14 +0100 Received: (qmail 95695 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2008 08:52:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=Qe1D+/+yZmoYEY75tv7KOkyDKNP3dddQQJ+M4F0jJc+/g1NnUCMFR89mBjdoJHB+axklM6nIgUEW/1F5p4vEtrZDaIYMh2aSbxjiyUeKBwe+B32hXnyUvTFCzH0FSrj9bQi2QDGneI5oDZlt70bgtwb7qArJAm8lMpSQ0zvYw3s= ; Received: from unknown (HELO DennisPC) (dennis.easterling@btinternet.com@86.130.77.141 with login) by smtp810.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2008 08:52:01 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: OhmWOewVM1nzwkKDQI_QNEPdZ1Ecy7PGETkEZWPYrKiLzokoRNcou2arxeAlZfEH2k1f2w75GPcdJzGsbNrUSQnxSOM2aoLlpdVQ_vj3D858FyZH.uy26cpKiWjFkNA- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <011925433193420FAA184FA6E7F8CDA9@DennisPC> From: "DENNIS EASTERLING" To: References: <004a01c8f19b$3d370520$a402a8c0@Inspiron> In-Reply-To: <004a01c8f19b$3d370520$a402a8c0@Inspiron> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:52:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: 500KHz NoV Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0036_01C8F2F3.13A033E0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C8F2F3.13A033E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Lee I have just got my NOV to operate on 500kHz, so will be dipping my toe into=20= the water from next week. I have not got any 138kHz experience and only obtained my full amateur licen= ce last May. On my application for the NOV, I provided a scale diagram of my own and imme= diate neighbour's properties, gave a brief description of the TX(home brew),= RX(Lowe HF-225) and antenna(T) that I intend to use and an estimate of my e= rp from the TANTENNA program on the internet (200mW). As I am using a VFO,=20= I use a counter to measure the frequency and also monitor transmissions usin= g the RX which has a digital readout. I also stated that I would cease tra= nsmissions until any complaint was satisfactorily resolverd, and mentioned t= wo nearby amateurs also working on 500kHz whose help and advice I could seek= . All the above seemed to work, so good luck on your application. The more th= e merrier. 73 Dennis M0JXM ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Lee Hudson=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:50 PM Subject: LF: 500KHz NoV Hi All, After reading through loads of stuff and monitoring the LF Group I'm left=20= with the decision of whether to start on 136 or 500KHz. 500KHz seems much easier to deal with from the outset, and hopefully the N= oV period will be extended further next year. However the NoV itself is the possible stumbling block in that it appears=20= that experience on 136KHz is a big plus that Ofcom appear to be looking for, My question is, would I get away with applying for a NoV without first bei= ng active on 136KHz, or has anyone already taken this route and been success= ful? 73, Lee M0LMH. ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C8F2F3.13A033E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Lee
 
I have just got my NOV to operate on 500kHz= , so=20 will be dipping my toe into the water from next week.
 
I have not got any 138kHz experience and on= ly=20 obtained my full amateur licence last May.
On my application for the NOV, I provided a= =20 scale diagram of my own and immediate neighbour's properties, gave a br= ief=20 description of the TX(home brew), RX(Lowe HF-225) and antenna(T) that I= =20 intend to use and an estimate of my erp from the TANTENNA program on the=20 internet (200mW).  As I am using a VFO, I use a counter to measure the=20 frequency and also monitor transmissions using the RX which has a digital=20 readout.   I also stated that I would cease transmissions until an= y=20 complaint was satisfactorily resolverd, and mentioned two nearby amateurs al= so=20 working on 500kHz whose help and advice I could seek.
 
All the above seemed to work, so good luck=20= on your=20 application.  The more the merrier.
 
73 Dennis M0JXM
----- Original Message -----
Lee Hudson
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:50=20 PM
Subject: LF: 500KHz NoV

Hi All,

 

After reading through loads of=20 stuff and monitoring the LF Group I=92m left with the decision of whether=20= to=20 start on 136 or 500KHz.

 

500KHz seems much easier to deal= =20 with from the outset, and hopefully the NoV period will be extended furthe= r=20 next year.

However the NoV itself is the=20 possible stumbling block in that it appears that experience on 136KHz is a= big=20 plus that Ofcom appear to be looking for,

 

My question is, would I get away= =20 with applying for a NoV without first being active on 136KHz, or has anyon= e=20 already taken this route and been successful?

 

73,

Lee M0LMH.

 

------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C8F2F3.13A033E0--