Message-ID: <011901c31622$24a8d790$0100a8c0@athlon>
From: "Dave Brown" <tractorb@ihug.co.nz>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <E19DpOo-0007nG-00@jandor.look.ca>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 23:57:17 +1200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: Mains Cable and other transmission lines
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

According to Vol 1 of the MIT Radiation Lab. Series, "Radar System
Engineering" published in 1947, the selection of 50 ohms was based on a
practical compromise between the 77 ohm value giving minimum attenuation and
the 30 ohm value giving maximum power transmission (based on maximum voltage
gradient).

Fairly obviously, insertion of a suitable dielectric was part of the way
forward in the evolution of a practical flexible general purpose coaxial
transmission line and the then newly developed polyethelene, when used as a
dielectric, gave a characteristic impedance of somewhat more than 51 ohms.
This evolved fairly quickly, especially in the USA, to the now standard 50
ohm figure.

You can find a good summary of  the derivation of the 'minimum loss'
impedance etc at  the following URL-

http://e-insite.net/ednmag/contents/images/47191.pdf

and in a little more detail at-

http://my.ece.ucsb.edu/bobsclass/134/Handouts/why50ohm.pdf

 My own primary reference on this is Chapter 1 of King, Mimno and Wing,
"Transmission Lines, Antennas and Waveguides", McGraw-Hill, 1945.
73
 Dave, ZL3FJ