Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 31CD53800009B; Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:08:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TAQNF-00080X-PS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:07:21 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TAQNC-00080O-FQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:07:18 +0100 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TAQN9-0005pN-Hn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:07:16 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Sep 2012 19:07:13 -0000 Received: from p5B395781.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO Clemens04) [91.57.87.129] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 08 Sep 2012 21:07:13 +0200 X-Authenticated: #17214767 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/+PVVldGv+WWe0A3uMKiMhOat3AHaR218usQDMwp vPWUABFIYoQYsK Message-ID: <011501cd8df5$27e95740$1502a8c0@Clemens04> From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <50493001.4050202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <16BEB82EDFAD4E4FB0A34C8BABAA6AE1@AGB> <504A14AD.2070403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <00ca01cd8ded$85328aa0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 21:07:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3664 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >wouldn't it be better to choose a slightly different qrg to avoid interfering with the carrier >of the 'RP' NDB beacon (which is BTW masking your signal here)? >Perhaps 500Hz up or down would be fine. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (cpaul[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: ecf102e6d15c1e466f357d5e6d956ac3 Subject: Re: LF: LF/MF night and weekend Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0111_01CD8E05.E9879550" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4086504b97c0548f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0111_01CD8E05.E9879550 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >wouldn't it be better to choose a slightly different qrg to avoid interfering with the carrier >of the 'RP' NDB beacon (which is BTW masking your signal here)? >Perhaps 500Hz up or down would be fine. OK,sorry, I see now that 477 is *dial* qrg. Your sig is S9+ on 478,7kHz. DF0WD is S9 with qsb on 472,5kHz now. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ ----- Original Message ----- From: Clemens Paul To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 8:12 PM Subject: Re: LF: LF/MF night and weekend >I just started my TX in OP4 mode on 477 kHz dial. Will run in until sunday evening Stefan, wouldn't it be better to choose a slightly different qrg to avoid interfering with the carrier of the 'RP' NDB beacon (which is BTW masking your signal here)? Perhaps 500Hz up or down would be fine. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Schäfer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 5:37 PM Subject: Re: LF: LF/MF night and weekend MF! I just started my TX in OP4 mode on 477 kHz dial. Will run in until sunday evening. BTW the PA was not damaged, it was just a under-dimensioned fuse which i used for the first tests and forgot to replace it by its actual value. Now the transmission should work without interruptions, i hope. Would be interesting to have some 24 hour monitoring data of the complete saturday, so if you like to take a part in this "study", pse run the RX during that time :-) Tnx and 73 to all, Stefan/DK7FC Am 07.09.2012 14:19, schrieb Graham: First demonstration that what go's East , not always go's West ! Spectacular s/n levels in the Moscow area but nothing showing TA ? G.. G.., It was probably due to thunderstorms in the US and SA. YV7MAE had to QRT due to heavy lightnings... E-Mail ist virenfrei. Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virendatenbank: 2437/5254 - Ausgabedatum: 07.09.2012 E-Mail ist virenfrei. Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virendatenbank: 2437/5256 - Ausgabedatum: 08.09.2012 ------=_NextPart_000_0111_01CD8E05.E9879550 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>wouldn't it be better to choose a slightly different qrg = to avoid=20 interfering with the carrier
>of  the 'RP' NDB beacon (which is BTW masking your = signal=20 here)?
>Perhaps 500Hz up or down would be fine.
 
OK,sorry, I see now that 477 is *dial* qrg.
Your sig is S9+ on 478,7kHz.
 
DF0WD is S9 with qsb on 472,5kHz now.
 
73
Clemens
DL4RAJ
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Clemens = Paul
Sent: Saturday, September 08, = 2012 8:12=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: LF/MF night = and=20 weekend

>I just started my TX in OP4 mode on 477 kHz = dial. Will=20 run in until sunday evening
 
Stefan,
 
wouldn't it be better to choose a slightly different qrg to = avoid=20 interfering with the carrier
of  the 'RP' NDB beacon (which is BTW masking your = signal=20 here)?
Perhaps 500Hz up or down would be fine.
 
73
Clemens
DL4RAJ
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=E4fer=20
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Sent: Friday, September 07, = 2012 5:37=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: LF/MF night = and=20 weekend

MF!

I just started my TX in OP4 mode on = 477=20 kHz dial. Will run in until sunday evening. BTW the PA = was not=20 damaged, it was just a under-dimensioned fuse which i used for the = first=20 tests and forgot to replace it by its actual value. Now the = transmission=20 should work without interruptions, i hope.

Would be = interesting to=20 have some 24 hour monitoring data of the complete saturday, so if = you like=20 to take a part in this "study", pse run the RX during that time=20 :-)


Tnx and 73 to all, = Stefan/DK7FC





Am=20 07.09.2012 14:19, schrieb Graham:=20
First  demonstration  that  = what =20 go's  East  , not  always  go's   = West !=20

Spectacular s/n levels  in the  = Moscow   area=20 but  nothing  showing
TA ?=20

G..


G.., It was probably due to=20 thunderstorms in the US and SA. YV7MAE had to QRT due to heavy=20 lightnings...

E-Mail ist = virenfrei.
Von AVG=20 =FCberpr=FCft - www.avg.de
Version:=20 2012.0.2197 / Virendatenbank: 2437/5254 - Ausgabedatum: 07.09.2012=20

E-Mail ist = virenfrei.
Von AVG=20 =FCberpr=FCft - www.avg.de
Version: 2012.0.2197=20 / Virendatenbank: 2437/5256 - Ausgabedatum: 08.09.2012=20

------=_NextPart_000_0111_01CD8E05.E9879550--