Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 59745380000A7; Sun, 9 Sep 2012 15:13:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TAmPC-0000DL-1E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 19:38:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TAmPB-0000DA-J1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 19:38:49 +0100 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TAmP9-0001Qb-V6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Sep 2012 19:38:48 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Sep 2012 18:38:46 -0000 Received: from p4FDD65CB.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO Clemens04) [79.221.101.203] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 09 Sep 2012 20:38:46 +0200 X-Authenticated: #17214767 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/dl8YWDcDdV/Tag7X090/CtY0g06vT5WGqpfMKsr KhZIGWUrW79nZK Message-ID: <010901cd8eba$58e92cb0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <504C8B28.6010206@t-online.de> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 20:31:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3664 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Wolf, the guys shouldn't be discouraged by negative comments of ONE SINGLE PERSON which is not an institution even if he might feel so. Maybe his comment was even meant with a sense humour which he repeatedly claims?? Perhaps they can source an E1800 (for love) which no one needs any more at the SWR facilities? Dont' laugh,this happened to an OM from the former Bundesgrenzschutz (now Bundesnetzagentur) when he retired. No one did know what to do with the receiver and they asked him to do them a favour and take the RX with him. This RX surely could cope with the strong signal levels there. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.23 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (cpaul[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 3b8620872b19e25fb6f4dfaf1256edc3 Subject: LF: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_DK0SWF-_what=C2=B4s_the_problem?= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6185504cea5e0e42 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Wolf, the guys shouldn't be discouraged by negative comments of ONE SINGLE PERSON which is not an institution even if he might feel so. Maybe his comment was even meant with a sense humour which he repeatedly claims?? Perhaps they can source an E1800 (for love) which no one needs any more at the SWR facilities? Dont' laugh,this happened to an OM from the former Bundesgrenzschutz (now Bundesnetzagentur) when he retired. No one did know what to do with the receiver and they asked him to do them a favour and take the RX with him. This RX surely could cope with the strong signal levels there. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr. Wolf Ostwald" To: Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 2:27 PM Subject: LF: DK0SWF- what´s the problem > hi ! > Instead of looking at the installation from the experimenters view, i hear > someone crying and whining. All things go thru evolution and of course the > "know it alls" never make mistakes or are less than perfect ;-) . > The ex-SWR site has lots of room and an receiving array surely can be next. > The activating guys had to work hard to get access to the facility and one > should give them time to proceed. They should be granted support instead words > of criticism from an "rocking chair" position. I´d rather think twice before > using the "whip" > > that`s my two pence worth de wolf df2py > > > > ----- > E-Mail ist virenfrei. > Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de > Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virendatenbank: 2437/5257 - Ausgabedatum: 08.09.2012