Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>
Received: (qmail 2525 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 14:05:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225)  by 10.226.25.101 with SMTP; 15 Feb 2001 14:05:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 14245 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2001 14:05:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70)  by murphys with SMTP; 15 Feb 2001 14:05:31 -0000
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14TOva-0000XG-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:58:34 +0000
Received: from [195.47.110.226] (helo=dell1.gmccz.cz.gmc.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14TOvZ-0000XB-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:58:33 +0000
Received: from p (p.maly.gmccz.cz.gmc.net [192.168.1.22]) by dell1.gmccz.cz.gmc.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id 150G1DLM; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:59:42 +0100
Message-ID: <010701c09756$c0c82e20$1601a8c0@maly.gmccz.cz.gmc.net>
From: "Petr Maly" <p.maly@gmc.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <000101c09751$4b554b00$f0b6883e@lvm>
Subject: LF: Re: Re. LF LDO>ZJ<ZZ a two way?
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:54:02 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

I always belived that 2-way QSO means contact between 2 stations, not 3 of
them.
Isn't this 3-way QSO ? (hi...).

73 Petr OK1FIG


----- Original Message -----
From: LAWRENCE MAYHEAD <laurie@g3aqc.freeserve.co.uk>
To: rsgb lf group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:14 PM
Subject: LF: Re. LF LDO>ZJ<ZZ a two way?


> I personally dont think that there can be much doubt that this was a
> QSO,between LDO and ZJ, with ZJ having a remote Tx at ZZs location. If
> there
> had been a 250 mile(dist. ZZ to ZJ I belive) switch line between them,
> when
> John identified Peters message he would  have pushed the transmit
> button! to
> reply. Since he did not have this land line he simply asked ZZ to push
> the
> button via an 80 m link,a pretty fine distinction in my opinion.What do
> you
> think ?  73s Laurie.
>
>
>