Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20;
Message-ID: <010201c7dea1$e45b0620$ef4e383e@Tom>
From: "Tom Boucher" <tom@telemetry.demon.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <PAEFLMFGBDKKCONLMLBIGENOCLAA.ganymede444@btopenworld.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:35:29 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Re: [500]: G3OLB  rst 549 , qsb , io83lk 21:19 hrs
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Dave

I've not heard Peter G3JFS for a while. Had a QSO or two with him when he 
first came on a few weeks ago and he was a very good signal here over the 60 
odd mile path, as you might expect. Perhaps we can twist his arm to come on 
again. I'm sure he would hear John's signal OK.

73
Tom G3OLB

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave G3WCB" <ganymede444@btopenworld.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 6:13 PM
Subject: LF: [500]: G3OLB rst 549 , qsb , io83lk 21:19 hrs


> LF, John and Tom,
>
> Congratulations on the DX contact, but there is someone a bit further 
> away!
> G3JFS in Plymouth is in IO70WJ, and I make the distance to be about 1109 
> km.
> Peter has been active on 500 kHz, but I don't know if he is currently QRV.
>
> Static levels are low in the SE today, so I will be listening later on 
> this
> evening.
>
> 73, Dave G3WCB IO91RM
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of John
> Pumford-Green GM4SLV
> Sent: 13 August 2007 22:53
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: Re: LF: G3OLB rst 549 , qsb , io83lk 21:19 hrs
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:07:13 +0100
> "Tom Boucher" <tom@telemetry.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Excellent John. Many thanks for a good QSO. At the end, at about
>> 2104, you were perfectly Q5, 549 by ear. Quite a lot of slow QSB on
>> you. I suppose that's about the best DX we can achieve at present?
>>
>> 73
>> Tom G3OLB
>>
>>
>
> Tom, LF
>
> I suppose Tom's right about the best DX workable, for now.
>
> You might want to try drawing a 1000km radius circle on a map
> centred on your QTH and see how far away I am in relation to most of
> Europe!
>
> Thanks again and hope to repeat the feat with slightly easier copy at
> your end. I've had regular QSOs this weekend with Finbar, but he's
> almost a local at just over 600km!
>
> Cheers again
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>