X-GM-THRID: 1243759534536987586 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.87.11 with SMTP id k11cs234090wxb; Fri, 3 Aug 2007 04:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.108.9 with SMTP id g9mr3733582buc.1186141523564; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 04:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d24si15483410nfh.2007.08.03.04.45.20; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 04:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1IGvUT-000513-PD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 12:38:45 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1IGvUT-00050u-3S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 12:38:45 +0100 Received: from anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.92]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IGvUP-0004nI-S9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 12:38:45 +0100 Received: from dyn-62-56-121-41.dslaccess.co.uk ([62.56.121.41] helo=Tom) by anchor-post-34.mail.demon.net with esmtpa (AUTH telemetry) (Exim 4.42) id 1IGvUL-0004JH-Ey for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:38:37 +0000 Message-ID: <00e601c7d5c2$e0d29fa0$a17d383e@Tom> From: "Tom Boucher" To: References: <005001c7d3fe$e4786d80$6400a8c0@oem17oeylz9on8> <001901c7d42b$e6fbeaa0$86048351@w4o8m9> <00a001c7d43c$f4180690$0a7ee150@o> <1IGMYh-02648G0@fwd31.t-online.de> <003001c7d4d1$fcaf0390$db3a383e@Tom> <000101c7d5a4$5f527220$4e69e150@o> <008901c7d5b0$eea7c040$a17d383e@Tom> <003801c7d5ba$56f3cc80$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL> Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:38:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Karma: 0: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: 500 / OLB test-sig... Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1567 Most interesting Jay. Your 136 installation looks extremely well engineered. The loading coil/variometer looks almost identical to the one I made for 136, without the gears and motor. I used an 1100' end fed wire when active on that band! 73, Tom G3OLB ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jay Rusgrove" To: Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 11:37 AM Subject: LF: Re: Re: 500 / OLB test-sig... > Tom > > That's a lot of wire in the air...congratulations! Usually the more the > better but in this case it > sounds like too much. One approach would be to trim the horizontal top > wire of the L to get the +j18 > close to 0. Then it would be a matter of matching the R to 50 ohms. You > could use a smaller version > of the tapped transformer shown near the bottom of this page: > > http://www.w1vd.com/XNStxantenna.html > > If a low SWR is important to you across the band you may want to shorten > the antenna beyond the j0 > point and add a variable inductor in series with the vertical wire. > > Jay W1VD / WD2XNS > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Boucher" > To: > Cc: "Finbar" > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 5:30 AM > Subject: LF: Re: 500 / OLB test-sig... > > > Rog (and others) - thank you for this. You may, or may not, be interested > in the matching > arrangement for my antenna. > > The antenna is an extension of my 160 metre inverted 'L' which has an 80' > vertical section to a tree > on a 20' bank - the effective height may therefore not be as much as 80'. > This antenna sits on 19 > radials which are 60 - 100' long and are either buried or lying on the > ground, in order to act as > trip wires for my XYL when she trespasses on my antenna area. > > An additional 358' has been added to this antenna to make the total > quarter wave length of 492'. > This added wire zig-zags for 50' or so then is largely in a straight line > held up by 3 further tree > halyards and ends up about 30' above ground. > > This antenna with no matching showed a minimum VSWR at 506KHz of 2.5:1 and > impedance of 22 + j18. By > empirical means (!) I established that a parallel capacitance of some 6000 > pF brought the SWR to a > low figure but, not unexpectedly, took the resonant frequency up to > 521KHz; an L-section using part > of the antenna's self-inductance. To bring the antenna back down to > 502KHz, I added a small > inductance between capacitor/coax and the base of the antenna. > > The final values were 9 micro-Henrys (22 turns on 1'' dia) and 6,600pF (3 > x 2,200 pf 1000v > polypropylene) giving 1.1:1 @ 503 KHz, 50 + j10. > > I was surprised at the high value of capacitance needed to resonate this > antenna and am not sure how > you go about calculating the necessary values as these were established by > trial and error. Perhaps > there is an academic out there who can tell me! > > 73, Tom > G3OLB > ----- Original Message ----- > From: GW3UEP > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 8:55 AM > Subject: LF: 500 / OLB test-sig... > > > Tom, > Hrd your test-loop ydy - steady S7 on meter - ur tidying up has wrkd! > Ur closing the gap on Mike [S9/40mls via Preseli mountain] over the > ~90mls part sea-path bn us. > Hope to improve ant nxt wk, jobs permitting. > Rog. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Gw3UEP > To: Tom Boucher > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 2:18 PM > Subject: Re: > > Tom - what hve u done? Fantastic sig nw - on meter S5/6... > >