Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd10.mx.aol.com (rly-dd10.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.157]) by air-dd04.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD042-ba0497cc3e0148; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:56:33 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd10.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD102-ba0497cc3e0148; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 14:56:18 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LRB5O-0004c8-0G for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:56:02 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LRB5N-0004bz-Jd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:56:01 +0000 Received: from mk-filter-4-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.100.55]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LRB5N-000469-4q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:56:01 +0000 X-Trace: 132962739/mk-filter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/88.106.2.20/None/g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 88.106.2.20 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk X-MUA: Microsoft Office Outlook 11Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsYEAO9RfElYagIU/2dsb2JhbACDRD+GFoNFvCQGhUU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.37,322,1231113600"; d="scan'208";a="132962739" Received: from 88-106-2-20.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO asus) ([88.106.2.20]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2009 19:55:54 +0000 From: "Gary - G4WGT" To: References: <20090125092908.0aec06a4@lurcher><7EC707A6E2D94414AEBBC52C6159581C@JimPC><002001c97f0a$cf16fac0$ae01a8c0@youry0mkaz8jaq><20090125165335.47fc3399@lurcher><7690F13DCE5D44BA8A5AA126607E7979@JimPC><20090125180430.1d63e1c7@lurcher><6449616DC58940A19C537A59F53828DA@AGB><00d201c97f20$bd909520$6401a8c0@asus><00d301c97f22$87d998d0$6401a8c0@asus> <20090125194232.05798210@lurcher> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:55:54 -0000 Message-ID: <00e101c97f26$eefca7b0$6401a8c0@asus> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20090125194232.05798210@lurcher> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 Thread-Index: Acl/JU7Wsftc5FiQQLWd0zkK9dsA4gAANR5A X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: RE: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hi John, LF, You wrote :- As to power reporting, I see that most people on LF/MF are attempting to estimate ERP, and use this figure in the beacon data. This aspect of power reporting method has been briefly discussed on LF but even on the HF bands there may well be as large a difference in antenna gains as there is on 500KHz. I believe that we should adopt the recommended WSPR standard then all the reporting is the same whether it is HF, MF or LF. Cheers, Gary - G4WGT. -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of John P-G Sent: 25 January 2009 19:43 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:24:23 -0000 "Gary - G4WGT" wrote: > > When I make the calculation I will insert the correct figure. > Hello Gary, LF, I'm getting a fairly reliable signal from you, with just enough QSB to dip under the decoding margin from time to time. As to power reporting, I see that most people on LF/MF are attempting to estimate ERP, and use this figure in the beacon data. There was much discussion on the WSPR forum on the merits or otherwise of this approach, in the HF sphere at least. It might be easier if we adopted the same approach as is recommended for HF use - to report the actual TX power, not ERP. I see your last beacon is reporting 3dBm! Wow... that really is "flea power". Of course 2mW ERP from a small antenna won't go as far as 2mW ERP from a large one. Cheers, John GM4SLV