Message-ID: <00dd01c9644b$dd153850$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <000701c962f1$b79b04c0$4201a8c0@home> <016901c963c8$1c543720$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <494EE0A8.5040607@telus.net> <004501c963cf$24a20db0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <000901c96356$9dffe3e0$4201a8c0@home> <006601c96428$a8c6cc80$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <494FAFCE.8060100@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:42:14 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Tilley" <sthed475@telus.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: 500kHz WSPR Beacon


> MAL wrote "..., which takes up a lot less bandwidth."
>
> Wrong, unless the little world you live in doesn't obey the laws of
> Physics and you really believe CW takes no BW.
>
> Most if not all viable digi modes on 600m operate in such a manner that
> they do not generate bandwidth wasting sidebands like even the best CW
> transmitters do by the simple nature of the keying. Worst case a PSK31
> signal occupies 32Hz.  A WSPR signal occupies 6Hz. Both modes allow for
> many QSOs or beacons in a small sliver of the band.  I see no reason
> that any of these modes cannot coexist with little or no impact on each
> other or CW aficionados pursuing their passion.


How can they coexist if it is proposed to fill the 3 khz slot with WSPR 
BEACONS, where does the CW man operate. You are correct about CW it does 
indeed take up bandwidth, but hand sent morse or qrs 3 is very economic in 
bandwidth terms  - good observation on your part!!!!!!!!!!
G3KEV

>
> http://fermi.la.asu.edu/w9cf/articles/click/index.html
>
> If the above is alittle too much for your small mind try this simple
> rule of thumb:
> /CW Bandwidth/ = wpm X 4
>
> So assuming your bluster is true and you are the world's best CW op,
> your bandwidth is surly more than any digi mode currently in use on the
> band and you should either slow down or go QRT if you really believe
> your logic.
>
> I await your further ramblings on how you've saved the world with CW and
> we're all lessor men for just not getting it...  With luck you'll stop
> wasting internet bandwidth with your nonsense.
>
> 73 Scott
> VE7TIL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.19/1859 - Release Date: 12/20/2008 
2:34 PM