Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp54642igc; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 07:23:59 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.174.36 with SMTP id bp4mr61471090wjc.7.1388762638261; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 07:23:58 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id wv8si10593251wjb.32.2014.01.03.07.23.57 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 07:23:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vz6CS-0003kt-3G for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:58:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vz6CR-0003kk-Hg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:58:11 +0000 Received: from vsmtp14.tin.it ([212.216.176.118]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vz6CP-0005Xv-6Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:58:10 +0000 Received: from marco09cqcdi12 (87.0.27.68) by vsmtp14.tin.it (8.6.060.28) id 521010191472D2A7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:58:07 +0100 Message-ID: <00d701cf0894$36449500$0201a8c0@marco09cqcdi12> From: "Marco Cadeddu" To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 14:58:06 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Uwe, just switched on since few minutes on this side, and probably made something wrong... Ant miniwhip like 10m from the roof (abr 45mabove ground) RX SpecLab using configuration "8.97kHz 0,95 mHz 300s MSK locked" I moved to 8270 Hz changing the the "center frequency" to 8270Hz being no able to QSY in other way (is that correct??) The SR calbrator is moved to 19580Hz GBZ. So this is the setup and see a signal just on 8270,0 Hz which is close to 20dB over the noise....ok this is the dreamer band but I can't believe I'm seeing your signal... Can anybody give a suggestion? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.216.176.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 74b370a313f780c8b04cdb625468086b Subject: LF: Re: 8270Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D4_01CF0894.35D46E10" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00D4_01CF0894.35D46E10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Uwe, just switched on since few minutes on this side, and probably made = something wrong... Ant miniwhip like 10m from the roof (abr 45mabove ground) RX SpecLab using configuration "8.97kHz 0,95 mHz 300s MSK locked" I = moved to 8270 Hz changing the the "center frequency" to 8270Hz being no = able to QSY in other way (is that correct??) The SR calbrator is moved to 19580Hz GBZ. So this is the setup and see a signal just on 8270,0 Hz which is close = to 20dB over the noise....ok this is the dreamer band but I can't = believe I'm seeing your signal... Can anybody give a suggestion? 73, Marco IK1HSS=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 1:30 PM Subject: LF: 8270Hz OK. OK. dreamers, the TX is on the air since 1309UTC.=20 QRG: 8270.000Hz. WX: continuous rain but not so strong. when ever the order comes, I can switch to Op-4H. GL Uwe/dj8wx -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 03.01.2014 13:21 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Kopie: paul@abelian.netcom.co.uk Betreff: Fw: VLF: 8.275 kHz -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- Paul Nicholson put forth the important argument that we'd better stay = away from 8280 because it's a multiple of 60 Hz. Mains harmonics tend to = drift a bit with the line frequeny so further away is better.=20 Thus I retract my preposition, and suggest instead to stay with the = original 8270 Hz. Uwe, go ahead! Best 73, Markus PS Direct harmonics from 16.67 Hz are relatively weak here, even = though the railway is only 400 m away. It looks more like carriers from = switchmode power conversion units (eg near 8 kHz), accompanied by the = telltale 33 Hz spaced sidebands. Unfortunately these frequencies are not = easily predictable.=20 From: Paul=20 Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 12:56 PM To: Markus Vester=20 Subject: Re: VLF: 8.275 kHz 8970 is well placed with respect to harmonics of both 50 and 60Hz. 8270/8275 not so good in a 60Hz region. 8124 to 8126 would be a good range, considering harmonics of 16.67Hz, 50Hz, and 60Hz. Let me know what is decided, I will switch my spectrogram over to the new band. -- Paul Nicholson -- ------=_NextPart_000_00D4_01CF0894.35D46E10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Uwe,
 
just switched on since few minutes on = this side,=20 and probably made something wrong...
Ant miniwhip like 10m from the roof = (abr 45mabove=20 ground)
RX SpecLab using configuration "8.97kHz = 0,95 mHz=20 300s MSK locked" I moved to 8270 Hz changing the the "center frequency" = to=20 8270Hz being no able to QSY in other way (is that = correct??)
The SR calbrator is moved to 19580Hz=20 GBZ.
So this is the setup and see a signal = just on=20 8270,0 Hz which is close to 20dB over the noise....ok this is the = dreamer band=20 but I can't believe I'm seeing your signal...
Can anybody give a = suggestion?
 
73, Marco IK1HSS 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de =
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 = 1:30=20 PM
Subject: LF: 8270Hz

OK.=20 OK. dreamers, the TX is on the air since 1309UTC.
QRG: = 8270.000Hz.
WX:=20 continuous rain but not so strong.
when ever the order comes, I can = switch=20 to Op-4H.
GL
Uwe/dj8wx
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Gesendet:=20 03.01.2014 13:21
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Kopie:=20 paul@abelian.netcom.co.ukBetreff:=20 Fw: VLF: 8.275 kHz

Paul = Nicholson put=20 forth the important argument that we'd better stay away from 8280 = because it's=20 a multiple of 60 Hz. Mains harmonics tend to drift a bit with the = line=20 frequeny so further away is better.
 
Thus I = retract my=20 preposition, and suggest instead to stay with the original = 8270=20 Hz.
 
Uwe, go=20 ahead!
 
Best = 73,
Markus
 
PS Direct = harmonics=20 from 16.67 Hz are relatively weak here, even though the railway is = only 400 m=20 away. It looks more like carriers from switchmode power = conversion units (eg near 8 kHz), accompanied by the = telltale=20 33 Hz spaced sidebands. Unfortunately these frequencies are not easily = predictable.=20
 

From: Paul
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: 8.275 kHz


8970 is well placed with respect to harmonics = of
both 50=20 and 60Hz.

8270/8275 not so good in a 60Hz region.

8124 = to 8126=20 would be a good range, considering
harmonics of 16.67Hz, 50Hz, and=20 60Hz.

Let me know what is decided, I will switch my = spectrogram
over=20 to the new band.

--
Paul=20 Nicholson
--
------=_NextPart_000_00D4_01CF0894.35D46E10--