Return-Path: Received: from rly-da08.mx.aol.com (rly-da08.mail.aol.com [172.19.129.82]) by air-da09.mail.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA091-a81495278dd37e; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:01:27 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-da08.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDA081-a81495278dd37e; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:01:03 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LFY2K-00072o-68 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:00:48 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LFY2J-00072f-EC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:00:47 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-1.talktalk.net ([62.24.128.231] helo=smtp.talktalk.net) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LFY2I-000426-8B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:00:47 +0000 X-Path: TTSMTP X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlApAOcHUklZ8PR3/2dsb2JhbAAWgiwtgWaGSgapLIpTWJEChkI Received: from unknown (HELO mal769a60aa920) ([89.240.244.119]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP; 24 Dec 2008 18:00:37 +0000 Message-ID: <00d101c965f1$872bd410$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <00ae01c965e5$9a2a4f30$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <000a01c965ee$da266160$6c01a8c0@DELL4> Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:00:38 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: Re: wspr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CE_01C965F1.86F29BA0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_00CE_01C965F1.86F29BA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jay Had u been on say qrs3 last nite I could have copied u fb on ur peaks. You w= ere strong enough at times but not sufficient for a printed copy on WSPR, mo= st of the time. We could try and if u can see M0bmu signal I think u will see me. In a 2 min slot we could certainly have exchanged reports. 73 and tnx de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: jrusgrove@comcast.net=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 5:41 PM Subject: LF: Re: wspr Mal I was transmitting with WSJT7 in WSPR mode last night. Haven't used it eno= ugh to say if it is 'better or worse', however it is designed to be used in=20= QSO mode rather than beacon mode so there are a number of differences. If you're interested in looking, I can transmit QRSS3 on Friday night for=20= a bit. Jay ----- Original Message -----=20 From: mal hamilton=20 To: rsgb=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 11:35 AM Subject: LF: wspr Has anyone tried WSJT 7.02 in WSPR mode and found it better than the wsp= r 1.01version. Your experience ? mal/g3kev ----------------------------------------------------------------------------= -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com=20 Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.0/1862 - Release Date: 12/23/200= 8 12:08 PM ------=_NextPart_000_00CE_01C965F1.86F29BA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Jay
Had u been on say qrs3 last nite I could ha= ve=20 copied u fb on ur peaks. You were strong enough at times but not sufficient=20= for=20 a printed copy on WSPR, most of the time.
We could try and if u can see M0bmu signal=20= I think=20 u will see me.
In a 2 min slot we could certainly have exc= hanged=20 reports.
73 and tnx de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
jrusgrove@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008=20= 5:41=20 PM
Subject: LF: Re: wspr

Mal
 
I was transmitting with WSJT7 in&nbs= p;WSPR=20 mode last night. Haven't used it enough to say if it is 'better or worse',= =20 however it is designed to be used in QSO mode rather than beacon mode so t= here=20 are a number of differences.
 
If you're interested in looking, I can tr= ansmit=20 QRSS3 on Friday night for a bit.
 
Jay
 
 
----- Original Message -----
To: rsgb=
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 200= 8=20 11:35 AM
Subject: LF: wspr

Has anyone tried WSJT 7.02 in WSPR mode= and=20 found it better than the wspr 1.01version.=20 Your experience ?
mal/g3kev
 


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -=20 http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.0/1862 -=20 Release Date: 12/23/2008 12:08 PM
------=_NextPart_000_00CE_01C965F1.86F29BA0--