Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dh12.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dh12.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.32]) by air-dd05.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD053-865b4d220228276; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:06:48 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh12.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 336F63800011A; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:06:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PZnqq-0005qS-87 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:05:44 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PZnqp-0005qJ-N4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:05:43 +0000 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PZnqo-0006NB-Nh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:05:43 +0000 Received: from know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.3]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20110103170536.EZHW23441.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net> for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 17:05:36 +0000 Received: from [86.23.64.238] (helo=desktop) by know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PZnqh-0007bS-S0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:05:36 +0000 From: "James Cowburn" To: References: <20110103144926.121420@gmx.net> <003501cbab58$13ed4660$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4E4CDEF5-8855-49E9-9F45-BB88C715B612@numeo.fr> <243915.15548.qm@web28104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 17:05:31 -0000 Message-ID: <00cf01cbab68$6e11f450$0217aac0@desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <243915.15548.qm@web28104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664 thread-index: AcurZ7b5O4gLnFtmRzG20ZlUTjNIxwAAJv0g X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=JvdXmxIgLJv2/GthKqHpGJEEHukvLcvELVXUanXFreg= c=1 sm=0 a=WMvZb_U1KcYA:10 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=tg0Y_uVgAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=O8y3iwMzKZEDmePs-cUA:9 a=uTi5sjVDmGntwD7krSBaaj8DrAAA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=92MfGHkF_jOeolRPkZ0A:9 a=j2vkEQbKs6QYcoqkGsMA:7 a=LAlAxD9YCzbK73kfsx0LV-sKukgA:4 a=RE83eOA-nSMA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: RE: LF: Re: SAQ transmits Jan. 3rd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D0_01CBAB68.6E11F450" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_70_80, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41204d2202257bd3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 ------=_NextPart_000_00D0_01CBAB68.6E11F450 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Tomorrows Headline! "Scarborough man in thin ice tragedy"! From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of M0FMT Sent: 03 January 2011 16:59 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Re: SAQ transmits Jan. 3rd Mal I think you are on thin ice there! 73 es GL petefmt I support www.NotSpotTelecom.Com your community Telco / ISP. _____ From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Mon, 3 January, 2011 16:37:12 Subject: Re: LF: Re: SAQ transmits Jan. 3rd Why will a proper Rx give better results than a soundcard? 'JNT On 3 January 2011 16:06, John Rabson wrote: Not lazy, just an alternative engineering solution, and for some people a more economical one. John F5VLF On 3 Jan 2011, at 16:08CET, mal hamilton wrote: > Guido > A sound card is LMRX (Lazy Mans Receiver). A proper RX and good wire antenna > on LF will always give optimum results. > > g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_00D0_01CBAB68.6E11F450 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Tomorrows Headl= ine!

 

“Scarborough man in thin ice tragedy”!

 

 

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blac= ksheep.org [mailto:owner-= rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of M0FMT
Sent: 03 January 2011= 16:59
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: SA= Q transmits Jan. 3rd

 

Mal I thin= k you are on thin ice there!
 

73 es GL= petefmt

 

I support www.NotSpotTelecom.Com your community Telco / ISP. <= /font>

 = ;

 = ;

From: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Mon, 3 January,= 2011 16:37:12
Subject: Re: LF: Re: SA= Q transmits Jan. 3rd

Why will a proper Rx give better results than= a soundcard?

 

'JNT

 



 

On 3 January 2011 16:06, John Rabson <john.rabson@numeo.fr> wrote:

Not lazy, just= an alternative engineering solution, and for some people a more economica= l one.

John F5VLF

On 3 Jan 2011, at 16:08CET, mal hamilton wrote:

> Guido
> A sound card is LMRX (Lazy Mans Receiver). A proper RX and good= wire antenna
> on LF will always give optimum results.
>
> g3kev

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_00D0_01CBAB68.6E11F450--