Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16644 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2001 20:55:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Apr 2001 20:55:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 1129 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2001 20:55:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 13 Apr 2001 20:55:48 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14oAOM-0005M6-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 21:42:06 +0100 Received: from mta5-rme.xtra.co.nz ([203.96.92.17]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14oAOL-0005Ho-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 21:42:06 +0100 Received: from xtr743187 ([202.27.178.66]) by mta5-rme.xtra.co.nz with SMTP id <20010413204106.FTZJ1079.mta5-rme.xtra.co.nz@xtr743187> for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 08:41:06 +1200 Message-ID: <00cb01c0c45a$3776b0c0$42b21bca@xtr743187> From: "Vernall" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3.0.1.16.20010412154807.40773f12@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> Subject: Re: LF: Bandwidths/Modes Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 08:41:26 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Rik, Very interesting on the three types of spectra: > So far I 'played' with 3 types of modulation : real BPSK, PSK (amplitudes > enveloped) and what I call 'soft' PSK (gradual phase transitions instead of > brute phase jumps). > The spectra (and and block diagram of the modulator) can be found at : > > http://www.qsl.net/on7yd/PSK_TEST/psk_test.htm > > It confirms that : > - BPSK is far too wide to be used with high power on 136kHz (unless you > live in the middle of nowhere or you just don't care about others) > - that PSK has the best (most narrow) bandwidth > - that 'soft' PSK may have some potential as a class-D suitable mode with > an acceptable bandwidth. I think it would be useful to include a 4th spectra for CW "on-off keying" as there is nearly a century of experience with sharing frequencies where there are finite key clicks. One criteria is for BPSK bandwidth to be no more than a same PEP and same data rate CW emission. 73, Bob