Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C34EB3800008D; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 10:29:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Sbujw-0005hX-GD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:28:08 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Sbujv-0005hO-RP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:28:07 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sbujt-0002cD-U2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:28:06 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhsFAM0Wzk9Ok8Ol/2dsb2JhbABFnl4DlVWBCIITBQEBBQgBAQNJAiwBAQMFAgEDBA0EAQEKDBkUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQGHbAMPrWANiU6KM2AaglQMgxYDiA2FMJdUgmCBX4E+ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,718,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="374373838" Received: from host-78-147-195-165.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.195.165]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 05 Jun 2012 15:28:04 +0100 Message-ID: <00ca01cd4327$6a58ea50$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <008101cd4316$964358f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:28:02 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: John I understant that but I have followed the procedures required but it keeps asking the same question over again why the delay in association with the rsgb group, which seems to be the problem. mal/g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.7 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: c40596c1cc3306f1877076595a921c57 Subject: Re: LF: vote Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C7_01CD4327.6A21FBD0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:485329728:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601a4fce17c21ea1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00C7_01CD4327.6A21FBD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John I understant that but I have followed the procedures required but it = keeps asking the same question over again why the delay in association with the rsgb group, which seems to be the = problem. mal/g3kev =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: John Gould=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 1:14 PM Subject: Re: LF: vote Mal, I've just sent you a reply to the same message on the other list. = I've also responded about your yahoo e-mail account, which means that = you do hold a Yahoo ID, it's just not associated with your membership of = the RSGB_LF_Group list (yet). 73 John, G3WKL On 5 June 2012 13:27, mal hamilton wrote: John I cannot vote on yahoo, the options are not open to me in spite of = being able to log in I therefore VOTE here to keep both reflectors going and this will = satisfy all concerned. My main objection was the way the transition suddenly took place = without proper consultation. I would suggest everyone votes openly on both reflectors, to avoid = lock outs like we are hearing about from several others. de mal/g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_00C7_01CD4327.6A21FBD0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
John
I understant that but I have followed the = procedures=20 required but it keeps asking the same question over again
why the delay in association with the rsgb = group, which=20 seems to be the problem.
mal/g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 John Gould
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 = 1:14=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: vote

Mal,

I've just sent you a reply to the same message on the other list. =  I've also responded about your yahoo e-mail account, which means = that=20 you do hold a Yahoo ID, it's just not associated with your membership = of the=20 RSGB_LF_Group list (yet).

73 John, G3WKL

On 5 June 2012 13:27, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:
John
I cannot vote on yahoo, the options are not = open to me=20 in spite of being able to log in
I therefore VOTE here to keep both = reflectors going=20 and this will satisfy all concerned.
My main objection was the way the transition = suddenly took place without proper consultation.
I would suggest everyone votes openly on = both=20 reflectors, to avoid lock outs like we are hearing about from = several=20 others.
 
de mal/g3kev
 

------=_NextPart_000_00C7_01CD4327.6A21FBD0--