X-GM-THRID: 1239849414365398926 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.172.10 with SMTP id u10cs441225hue; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.182.1 with SMTP id e1mr3289804buf.1182412543129; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d23si7695082nfh.2007.06.21.00.55.31; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1I1HRS-00069X-Jy for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:50:58 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1I1HRP-00069K-Bb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:50:56 +0100 Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.90]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I1HR9-0007BI-Cj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:50:51 +0100 Received: from dyn-62-56-125-190.dslaccess.co.uk ([62.56.125.190] helo=Tom) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtpa (AUTH telemetry) (Exim 4.42) id 1I1HR3-000IAW-8H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:50:33 +0000 Message-ID: <00c701c7b3d8$e0ff8b20$be7d383e@Tom> From: "Tom Boucher" To: References: <062020072228.467.4679A9F000059E24000001D322058891160B97010D0A020E06979D0E03@comcast.net> <001801c7b392$de27dce0$0300a8c0@lark> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:50:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: Re: LF Vertical Antennas problem... Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1098 Warren I also had a strange effect when strapping a coax fed 80m dipole at ground level for use as a 160m 'TEE'. It appeared to show 2 resonant frequencies a few Khz apart. When I strapped the feeder at the top as well as the bottom of the feeder, all was OK! 73 Tom G3OLB ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" To: Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 12:29 AM Subject: LF: Re: LF Vertical Antennas problem... > Hi Warren that sounds familiar !! I think you are using covered wire, my > guess is a break on one leg so that you do not have enough capacitance to > resonate with the original coils. A top-band dipole will still work quite > well with one leg disconnected. Can you leave out the loading coil and > measure the resonance frequency of the wire T alone that might give some > clues. I have had this effect when part of the top load comes > disconnected. > > Good Luck with it > Cheers de Alan G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: rsgb lf reflector ; rsgb lf reflector > > Sent: 20 June 2007 23:28 > Subject: LF: LF Vertical Antennas problem... > > >> Hello the list, >> >> I have in the past used my 160 meter dipole as a vertical "T" by >> tying > the feeders together and using a tapped loading coil to resonate and match > the antenna. I could get a perfect 50 ohm match in this manner and it > radiated quite well - Hartmut copied my transmission running around 100 > watts. I have also used the same setup on 500kHz with a different loading > coil successfully. >> >> Now I find that I cannot resonate the antenna - I can't eliminate the > reactance no matter what the setting of the tap or the coil. The best I > can > do is an swr of 1.7:1 and at least 40 ohms of reactance. I have tried > changing coils and still the problem persists. If I do transmit this way, > my signal seems to be down at least 10dB below what it was when the > antenna > resonated properly. Any thoughts? >> >> >> -- >> 73 Warren K2ORS/WD2XGJ/WD2XSH/23/WE2XEB/2 >> FN42hi >> http://www.w4dex.com/wd2xgj.htm >> > >