Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22868 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2001 20:18:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 29 Jan 2001 20:18:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 9895 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2001 20:12:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 29 Jan 2001 20:12:42 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14NKYq-0000ZQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:06:00 +0000 Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au ([203.26.10.16]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14NKYo-0000ZL-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:05:58 +0000 Received: from steve (ppp169.dyn154.pacific.net.au [210.23.154.169]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id HAA10508 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 07:05:39 +1100 Message-ID: <00b701c08a2f$5656d0c0$0301a8c0@steve> From: "Steve Olney" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000601c08956$e5702a60$686b883e@default> Subject: LF: Re: Volunteer Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 07:08:42 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: G'day Mal, > I will volunteer to be the first to be banished from the list for > discussing the use of CW on LF. > Oh dear, seems there isn't a rush to try and dissaude you from your voluntary banishment. I guess its hard to type with all fingers and toes crossed :-). Seriously though, despite the deafening silence on this group to dissuade you from this action, I for one (and I am *really* sure that I am not alone in this) would ask you not to do this. I don't agree with your opinions most of the time (now there's a bulletin) but I support your right to express them. You are quite right that humour is different in different places, that's why it is useful to add a smiley face at the end. Also I don't know if you are aware of this, but using uppercase in posts is the email equivalent of SHOUTING 6" from someones ear. I am sure that is not something that you would like people to think you are intending. Perhaps the using standard asterisks at either end for *emphasis* that I am sure you are aware of might be more suitable. Anyway, I look forward to your continued input (as I have said many times before) although it may be helpful to appreciate that we are all aware of your CW skills and the size of your installation - well done !!! However excessive repetition of this serves to lessen the regard for those achievements. We could all benefit from your sharp and active mind instead being applied to the advancement of our necessarily technological hobby as well as the modes which are the most appropriate for the narrowest allocation of any Ham band. 73s Steve Olney (VK2ZTO/AXSO - QF56IK : Lat -33 34 07, Long +150 44 40) ============================================= HomePage URLs: http://www.qsl.net/vk2zto http://www.zeta.org.au/~ollaneg Containing:- ULF, ELF, VLF & LF Experimentation InfraSonic Experimentation Laser Comms DX Amateur Radio Astronomy =============================================