Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:19:13 +0000 Received: by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1FE9RJ-0008Jw-7m for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:19:13 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1FE9RJ-0008JS-3a for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:19:13 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FE9R4-0000Ah-Jh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:18:58 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FE9R4-0000AY-3G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:18:58 +0000 Received: from smtp810.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.200]) by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FEAM9-0006eS-G5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:17:58 +0000 Received: (qmail 24271 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2006 18:17:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO LAPTOP) (peter.martinez@btinternet.com@86.135.51.89 with login) by smtp810.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2006 18:17:53 -0000 Message-ID: <00ac01c63c93$4ac8f1e0$0300a8c0@LAPTOP> From: "Peter Martinez" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000701c63c87$671f64c0$1bd0fc3e@your4105e587b6> <000401c63c91$6af36ba0$0600a8c0@router> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:17:53 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: LF: Re: NAVSTAR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hi Mal and Uwe: I think NAVSTAR is more likely to be a NAVTEX antenna than a GPS antenna. It might just be designed for 518kHz and therefore not so suitable for LF, but some of these ships antennas were OK for NAVTEX and Decca (70-125kHz) simultaneously. 73 Peter G3PLX