Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16448 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2002 22:57:15 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 12 Nov 2002 22:57:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 17516 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2002 22:56:45 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Nov 2002 22:56:45 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18BjxR-0002Yc-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:56:33 +0000 Received: from [62.253.164.46] (helo=mta6-svc.business.ntl.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18BjxR-0002YT-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:56:33 +0000 Received: from jackie ([217.137.114.6]) by mta6-svc.business.ntl.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20021112225632.RIYH9450.mta6-svc.business.ntl.com@jackie> for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:56:32 +0000 Message-ID: <00a801c28a9e$b6db81e0$067289d9@jackie> From: "Steve Thompson" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:56:18 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Puzzles Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group ----- Original Message ----- From: John W Gould To: Sent: 12 November 2002 19:02 Subject: LF: Puzzles > Fine! I personally don't mind as I find them interesting - the question is > do the majority of the reflector users mind the scope of the reflector to > broaden to include such technical intrigues? I must admit that it is better > than spam and helps to keep the brain going between M-Class flares and other > discussions more relevant to LF.... I'm happy to change the unwritten scope > for the reflector if we don't otherwise have any serious dissenters, so > (brief) comments please either way ... > > 73 John, G3WKL Why not see if it becomes a problem and wield a gavel if necessary? I subscribe to a number of discussion roups, and this one stands out for the quality of contributions I see. Anything that makes me think, or teaches (or reminds me) of technical issues is of interest. Steve