Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:24:44 +0100 Received: from ptb-spamcore01.plus.net ([192.168.71.1]) by ptb-mxcore04.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DPRBE-0003sp-JW for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:24:44 +0100 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DPRCu-000PQ8-Ex for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:26:28 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.4] (helo=ptb-mxcore04.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DPRCu-000PQ3-Ai for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:26:28 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore04.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DPRBE-0003sO-5O for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:24:44 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DPR8r-0000KD-EZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:22:17 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DPR8r-0000K4-0L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:22:17 +0100 Received: from smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.79]) by relay.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPR8p-00070g-Ei for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:22:16 +0100 Received: (qmail 13017 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2005 20:22:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (68.116.172.18) by smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.79) with ESMTP; 23 Apr 2005 20:22:10 -0000 Message-ID: <00a701c54839$d5e1adc0$0500a8c0@charter.net> From: "John Andrews" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <6.43a9c06c.2f9bdad1@aol.com> Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 20:22:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 64.202.165.79 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of w1tag.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: Re: LF: WOLF Tonight Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Markus, I think WOLF may have some real potential on that long path when the bit rate is slowed down and the sync issue resolved by 1 pps ticks, or whatever. Of course, the throughput will suffer a bit! The present 960 bit message would take 16 minutes at a 1 b/s rate. Perhaps if GPS sync is adopted, the reference channel will be less critical, and we could halve that time. Smarter guys than I will have to work that out! John Andrews