Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15635 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 00:54:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 00:54:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 15114 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2001 00:54:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 21 Feb 2001 00:54:38 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VNRv-0000tV-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:48:07 +0000 Received: from phoenix.coastalnet.com ([216.10.160.35]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14VNRt-0000tQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2001 00:48:05 +0000 Received: from wd4kpd (pm-wsh3-125.coastalnet.com [205.245.121.125]) by phoenix.coastalnet.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA11499 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:47:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <00a501c09b9f$e8d74020$7d79f5cd@wd4kpd> From: "David Michael Gaytko" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: QRS software Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:22:27 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: not using qsk here, but sure would like soundcard output !!! please... david -----Original Message----- From: Rik Strobbe To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 15:55 GMT Subject: LF: QRS software >At the moment I am working on a new version of QRS that allows longer >dotlengths (up to 1 hour/dot) and has more precise timing. > >As I hope to reach most users of QRS via this reflector I have one question : >Is anyone currently using the QSK facility ? > >The combination of QSK and precise timing will cause some major changes in >the programme (and some extra hours of work). I am willing to keep the QSK >facility if there is some interest in this option, otherwise I will abandon >QSK. >In case you want me to keep the QSK option, please let me know. > >73, Rik ON7YD > > >