Message-ID: <009801c823ba$393bd1d0$1b196a58@wgt01>
From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <007301c823ae$f8ef4090$1b196a58@wgt01> <4735DCEE.27980.223D387@dave.davesergeant.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:53:30 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: Antenna upgrade etc
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hello Dave,

Thank you for your comments.

Yes I was using the new antenna arrangement last night for my initial 
testing. It does seem to be producing good traces on the grabbers but you 
never can tell if its due to conditions & not the antenna.

OK your comments on the images etc, the 2 images at the bottom have not been 
re-scaled as I usually do, photos taken this afternoon before uploading, I 
will investigate.

The publishing software is indeed Serif  - Web Plus 7, nice price for the 
features.

Cheers,

Gary.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Sergeant" <dave@davesergeant.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Antenna upgrade etc


> Not sure if you were using the new arrangement last night Gary, but
> you were a good signal, 579ish, down here in Bracknell. Not that much
> weaker than the G0MRF beacon which you were somewhat underneath.
>
> As to the website, no real comments except that the picture of the
> new arrangement (image13952.jpg) is not very clear and you can't
> easily read the text. Probably you have resized it from a larger
> image and lost resolution. And on that subject, your two pictures at
> the bottom are HUGE (600kb and 213kb), you should resize them to be
> much smaller.
>
> I see it is done in Serif, which I understand is a publishing package
> and not the best for html, which shows. There is a lot of redundant
> code and all the absolute positioning makes it very hard to follow
> the source.
>
> But apart from that, it looks fine...
>
> 73 Dave G3YMC