Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <009201c7ce9c$12b3c5e0$9d4f6a58@wgt01>
From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <cbe.102c1b83.33d7d1ff@aol.com> <46A68468.5060006@telia.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:13:32 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: Time to learn a new Q code
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hi Johan,

Had to dig out my Post Office "Handbook for Radio Operators" for those Q's 
!!

73

Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Johan H. Bodin" <jh.bodin@telia.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Time to learn a new Q code


> Colin G3VTT wrote:
>> Perhaps we could also introduce ZHN and ZHP into common usage.
>
> Well, I think the T/M/O system is more efficient than ZHN 3/2/1 for
> reporting QRSS beacons. These days there can be many resons for ZHP,
> for example "ZHP hard disk failure" or just "ZHP computer allergy" :-)
>
> One of my favourites is QUPx, which in case of QUP2 and QUP3 means
> "Please indicate your position by black smoke" and "Please indicate
> your position by pyrotechnics", respectively. QUP has the potential
> to become a very useful Q code when communicating with stations
> operating from some kind of FPL (FET Popping Laboratory).
>
> 73
> Johan
>
>