Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8065 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 11:23:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-mxscan03.plus.net) (212.159.14.237) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 11:23:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 81517 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 11:23:51 -0000 X-Filtered-by: Plusnet (hmail v1.01) X-Spam-detection-level: 11 Received: from ptb-mxcore03.plus.net (212.159.14.217) by ptb-mxscan03.plus.net with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 11:23:46 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BE4yA-000KjJ-18 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:23:46 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: majordom Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BE4xa-0004TG-E6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:23:10 +0100 Received: from [213.232.95.59] (helo=relay.salmark.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BE4xa-0004T7-0p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:23:10 +0100 Received: from mta04-svc.ntlworld.com ([62.253.162.44]) by relay.salmark.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BE4xX-0002g9-7j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:23:07 +0100 X-Fake-Domain: captbrian Received: from captbrian ([80.1.84.62]) by mta04-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20040415112211.MMOF1202.mta04-svc.ntlworld.com@captbrian> for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:22:11 +0100 X-Bad-Message-ID: no DNS (captbrian) Message-ID: <009101c422dc$388c8820$20540150@captbrian> From: "captbrian" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000c01c420a4$e0c5c7c0$33e8fc3e@l8p8y6> <004001c42268$865e80e0$2102000a@ibm> <62127349468.20040415090237@73.ru> <004f01c422d6$beb9a640$e901a8c0@bob2l2u6k2n1g3> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:24:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1 Subject: LF: Re: Path length Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SPAMFiltered: yes X-Spam-Rating: 2 But ......is one of you higher and so using a bigger earth radius? ;-) G3GVB ----- Original Message ----- From: Vernall To: Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:45 AM Subject: LF: Path length > Hi all, > > Andrew ZL2BBJ and myself both live in Wellington, so it is of interest to > work out who has the longer path length to RN6BN. It is of course the short > path. A detailed check for differential path length, using a 1:50,000 scale > map, finds that ZL2BBJ is some 2.4 km further from RN6BN than ZL2CA. So not > much in it, but for record claiming purposes Andrew has the longer path. > > I am suppressing a desire to relocate to the eastern suburbs ;-) > > 73, Bob ZL2CA > > > >