Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp146338igc; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:08:25 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.57.243 with SMTP id l19mr3965298wjq.54.1387570104613; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:08:24 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fi4si4348654wib.74.2013.12.20.12.08.24 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:08:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vu5hq-0000sZ-IA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:25:54 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vu5hq-0000sQ-1C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:25:54 +0000 Received: from qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.96]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu5hn-0000hb-OM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:25:52 +0000 Received: from omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36]) by qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3u7W1n0020mv7h059vRoCo; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:25:48 +0000 Received: from DELL4 ([71.234.119.9]) by omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 3vRo1n00D0CFS1j3XvRonH; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:25:48 +0000 Message-ID: <009001cefdb9$49aa7cd0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> From: To: References: <005d01cefd22$36f84a00$6401a8c0@JAYDELL>, <52B48C4C.50901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:25:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1387567548; bh=GgIGX2VpR6HkvYlaGNWiGsPtDqBY4zd/Qnqog6zF4hM=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=bm50GHPOXiQhvC6jzE28W/bTqGJgjZJ7b1JoOZaZ6Ub3v6SRSguYTUQ48+0i7Jgyl u8mw1X8i1DI5AgJfGWCOwX5m4yHDr4b/6rMsT9HOjp5//d4DUWZ8PltOpNpkYX4tAh B+rZeqICTakPQ0wPwYP01029R7uvOvgoaUtMr0IGABWKO1HNKmqDpzk+5vsgm/EQ4t JcDpz8d556lprlAzEccEi2vX4DyukxAK9d8/wG/Zr8I591CNt2JJZk21BH9YAd4nvL 2jyyQZLkh46qUED8fleV1py6gZZDNAai3wQegn5yGk5HR1f+UAv4VfB4SpFy6gcEtR lnFTK/FQ2cY2Q== X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan >Overloaded RX because your signal is 30 dB above the noise in 1 Hz NBW? Try a measured 30+ + dB above the noise in 3.2 kHz BW ... that's the way it is here. If you haven't experienced that get out a signal generator, key it, and inject it into your receiver along with the weak signals in OP or WSPR. Let me know how you make out. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.96 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 64437c466041e93ffedda7fb96b22b71 Subject: Re: LF: OPERA overload? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2538 Stefan >Overloaded RX because your signal is 30 dB above the noise in 1 Hz NBW? Try a measured 30+ + dB above the noise in 3.2 kHz BW ... that's the way it is here. If you haven't experienced that get out a signal generator, key it, and inject it into your receiver along with the weak signals in OP or WSPR. Let me know how you make out. Jay ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Schäfer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 1:28 PM Subject: Re: LF: OPERA overload? Hello Bob, Am 20.12.2013 18:54, schrieb Bob Raide: G et all; Things have changed over this pasted year or so. Many more new stations have come on and these newbies are running lower power and RXers that may not be up to what some of the veteran ops are using. There really isn't allot of room for QRO in the 630 meter band Do you get complaints? What is the argumentation? What do they say? Same as here? 10000s of crashed air planes due to NDB interference? Overloaded RX because your signal is 30 dB above the noise in 1 Hz NBW? One day the A-Team will come and shoot down the antenna and PA, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MVonyVSQoM ;-) Or is it maybe just envy, sometimes? I assume Jay doesn't see a problem when you go QRO sometimes, like Markus doesn't when i do. And i do not when Markus does or DK6SX/p on MF or DK2DB. It's just all fine :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC