Return-Path: Received: from mtain-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.89]) by air-db06.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB061-85f24cc1f10113; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:16:01 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6941E38000111; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:15:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P9O0W-0003fK-1I for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:14:32 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P9O0V-0003fB-L6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:14:31 +0100 Received: from smtp820.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.249]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P9O0S-0003tO-Vd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:14:31 +0100 Received: (qmail 79956 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2010 20:14:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=F44sj38Jo56R+THALr5iz80iuBM7xPBp/Q6mtbwI1xhlRn0HTIuPUZy7O5rRaxLWXYVXeW266eM2X792IYHzdu10HzF7S7ZPFU4EiBYbYT4GytASavJFixbGOjX0y0XY6by+RPWwSByfcOh0UEYq3qX4E/u+cfRzGtTe+kdFxdw= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1287778463; bh=dXoL88MNd5yjTV440jqJwO0+Qay2gzEFQdpHwjRcBVg=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=BvsVUkfWADSa9Dj5pvgCYYANVBQBJ6jUJC5lT6McYqmltB6VvHC/DttUVvX+EhQpU6Jr+dCvdH042pIcXYa1jmAIF1KVe4q+Nv8yA4xG7YeXeqcqmPYTRKFhPn15HlDeMvg1k+uE0M0EhKp+ken42ly0VWYIFGrYiUoqotGHq+g= Received: from lark (alan.melia@86.157.30.157 with login) by smtp820.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 20:14:23 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-YMail-OSG: WSa83qwVM1nWIghTWyOb_EWspg0IqybOWdWbSuBXKMZICGD 4IKz7kMDpnV6vEf9ut1aIBEg2QnWNcXoRlNW1evQ6Exu2D8ksNs11dqd0CgI 516.kfZ34nY1oWdca2dngJZV6jSP3N8h1uVAroTNLIdRzqRM.aNCrfoqhZrN 5NLt_2dczsG3Iso.CH.X13wEb5xl2ax8bo3SQjiDz_um8FClUOu4Vu.HTSmm DKbzqeN_w5d1BqPOGp783InK.QiBI05OTQEVWJzd5vLjRYu_6Kv8G2tqZzJF J3SX48eRmOVWFCGgVw4Ixo.E8uZ8J8a1BgXA- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <008601cb7225$baf33ad0$4001a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:14:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.2001 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.2001 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 101022-1, 22/10/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d224.1 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40594cc1f0ff285e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none No a good idea Jacek Ofcoms regulatory powers do not end at 9kHz. They have powers over radiation at any frequency. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacek Lipkowski" To: Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:45 PM Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > > > *Frequencies allowed:* 8.7kHz - 9.1kHz > > i wonder what would happen if you applied specifically for 8.0-8.990kHz > (no frequency >9kHz). is expanding the frequency range above 9kHz a trick > by OFCOM, so that they can show that they have juristiction? > > VY 73 > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > >