Return-Path: Received: from rly-dg11.mx.aol.com (rly-dg11.mail.aol.com [172.19.151.95]) by air-dg01.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINDG011-6024a9d73b637; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:19:36 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dg11.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDG113-6024a9d73b637; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:19:20 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1MiYrx-0001Ve-DS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:18:17 +0100 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1MiYrw-0001VU-Rh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:18:16 +0100 Received: from ttsmtp-3.cpwnetworks.com ([62.24.128.244] helo=ttsmtp.cpwnetworks.com) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MiYrp-0003wH-0q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:18:11 +0100 X-Path: TalkTalk-smtp X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuwEAAsQnUpOlLlN/2dsb2JhbACCKC6CI4kCBs5BhBsF Received: from unknown (HELO mal769a60aa920) ([78.148.185.77]) by ttsmtp.cpwnetworks.com with SMTP; 01 Sep 2009 20:17:59 +0100 Message-ID: <008601ca2b38$eaff8e20$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <005601ca2b2f$f97ee260$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <9afca2640909011147h729e43bcue7e802389ed3231f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 20:17:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: wspr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0083_01CA2B41.4C8ABDB0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_0083_01CA2B41.4C8ABDB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roger I am stating the facts, someone else mentioned seeing the signal= s on the waterfall but they were not decoding. I could easlily have ma= de a qso on cw given the strength of signals whereas WSPR was not deco= ding, so the exercise is pointless. Get active on LF/MF transmitting and try the various modes then let me= have your opinion. We could have a qso on CW while WSPR is warming up= !!!!!!!! g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Roger Lapthorn=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:47 PM Subject: Re: LF: wspr Mal, Not helpful and factually incorrect. 73s Roger 2009/9/1 mal hamilton All WSPR signals last evening struggling in QRN/QRS whereas they= were audible here and if in CW mode I could easily have made a real= time QSO. decode was marginal, and then the same old repetive rubbish. g3kev =20 --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 ----------------------------------------------------------------------= -------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com=20 Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.74/2339 - Release Date: 09= /01/09 06:52:00 ------=_NextPart_000_0083_01CA2B41.4C8ABDB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Roger I am stating the facts, someone= else=20 mentioned seeing the signals on the waterfall but they were not decodi= ng. I=20 could easlily have made a qso on cw given the strength of signals wher= eas WSPR=20 was not decoding, so the exercise is pointless.
Get active on LF/MF transmitting and= try the=20 various modes then let me have your opinion. We could have a qso on CW= while=20 WSPR is warming up!!!!!!!!
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 01,= 2009 7:47=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr

Mal,

Not helpful and factually=20 incorrect.

73s
Roger



2009/9/1 mal hamilton <<= A href=3D"mailto:g3kevmal@talktalk.net">g3kevmal@talktalk.net&= gt;
All WSPR signals last evening str= uggling in=20 QRN/QRS whereas they were audible here and if in CW mode I co= uld easily=20 have made a real time QSO.
decode was marginal, and then the= same old=20 repetive rubbish.
g3kev
 
  



--=20
-------------------------------------------------------------http://g3xbm-qrp.blogs= pot.com/
http://www.g3xb= m.co.uk
G3XBM  =20  GQRP 1678      ISWL G11088


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AV= G -=20 www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.74/2339 -= Release=20 Date: 09/01/09 06:52:00
------=_NextPart_000_0083_01CA2B41.4C8ABDB0--