Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dh07.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dh07.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.27]) by air-mb02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMB024-a1924c69aab4296; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:16:36 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dh07.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0CC1A3800011D; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:16:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ol71y-0002JT-FT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:15:42 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ol71y-0002JI-1W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:15:42 +0100 Received: from smtp815.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.244]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ol71x-0002Hj-9t for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:15:42 +0100 Received: (qmail 15433 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2010 21:15:35 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=T6UQL2AnP4MN8f/pSx6xbc1Gbj5DtrPZ/qys/CiEyveywMUT9YVKaBTg4qgnB3wU035d1g4t1whXA4XHf7LU4KrwgCQLMXAY72SuSY831NYwby4RYyeowLsTMNdA2hwvPskhG81VRc2CIqbFQAxuVNAIewur4hgTcJ68Vs2mF6o= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1281993335; bh=sw5+37zIrSRT5ZWT29YnjY/wdd2XT/xpHywd5YjUm5g=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=3odVY1op+vYZyB7bKPhaoIqQsAksVkCdl88/auV5vt1Kbz7hQwPqdu1mhT8IxxiydlVFtwEn713pb5QY6jyuFES3n7C4TQtYYYCT6jvyjCSOUD1HA/dpDfRGwA2mCLANsgQxTXo9KTxa5RldvXimWS+aTyvTXPJ/xPSW4/MUomg= Received: from lark (alan.melia@86.156.35.237 with login) by smtp815.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Aug 2010 21:15:35 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-YMail-OSG: DUHLCQwVM1kB8RS92FBZS4K8OY_I8de0wPFWPX.hRUdihru PyoddS6LOudJDzM.XPvMfvGMP3.yqvNayFw6kKxR14EmiEwLwnpeo8ctzzXV wEczMbtE514j4LitK8RYJOU6bmtGsxv7OWOecMqCXfyvisKItVBBy_KgB_x0 yDIa0XYZ0k7zoe71O2kZFlPYZeNIDhyf1l0rVTomG2Q4iLKOTnFvNw1xgmrB _ZAmZ5DlQz5sWBA8JRfnaUSpFB.dX4yCwtxm4fr90U3d7e8cH.wo2HrE3UC4 n0AQPlmhggxklXNE7jPTLTuQpjdrXIydHU9M- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <008501cb3d88$2c4ab050$4001a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <4C694CC6.3010609@o2.ie> <006401cb3d5a$e4ebca00$4001a8c0@lark> <4C696537.6090107@o2.ie> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:56:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.2001 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.2001 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100816-1, 16/08/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Earth electrode antenna tests Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d307.2 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d411b4c69aab22d7b X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Tony, It probably depends how far away the detector was you need to be about 1km out for certain results. Alan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony" To: Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 5:20 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Earth electrode antenna tests > Hi Alan. > > Last week I hooked up my sig genny to the loop and the maximum signal > was at right angles to the wire, so I was expecting receive to be the same. > Seems not. > > Tony, EI8JK > > > On 16/08/2010 16:51, Alan Melia wrote: > > Hi Tony, why do you think the directivity is wrong? It looks as though they > > are operating like loops with the majority of the loop area in the ground. > > This is a fairly common appreciation of ground "aerials" though Dave Gibson > > doesnt seem to agree > > :-)) > > > > Alan > > G3NYK > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tony" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 3:35 PM > > Subject: LF: Earth electrode antenna tests > > > > > >> Yesterday I spent some time playing with different antennae. > >> I started by laying out another wire 52m long orientated roughly > >> north/south and then I shortened my original wire also to be 52m and > >> this one is east/west, both terminated with an earth rod. > >> Results were not as expected however as although the two earth electrode > >> antennae show most definite directivity they were the wrong direction. > >> > >> I monitored BBC R. Bristol on 1548 KHz which is about 500 Km due east of > >> me and on the inverted L (tuned VSWR 1.6:1) I could just detect a > >> carrier heterodyne, on the N/S earth electrode antenna it was S1 but on > >> the E/W earth electrode antenna it was S3. > >> RNE5 on 531 KHz about 960 Km due south of me was S3 on the E/W and S8 on > >> the N/S > >> > >> HGA22 (135 KHz) to my east was S4 on the E/W and S1 on N/S > >> > >> Readings were taken about 12:00 utc so most definitely ground wave. > >> > >> I was expecting the directivity to be broadside on the earth electrode > >> antennae, but they seem to behave like a Beverage in that respect, but > >> something that I think I will investigate further, maybe see if there is > >> any difference if I terminate them with a resistor. > >> I'm sure Mal is correct though that they would be useless to TX through > >> but for RX they seem to have possibilities especially after dark as they > >> are a lot quieter. > >> > >> All good fun. > >> 73, Tony, EI8JK. > >> > > > > > > > >