Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp100985igb; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 14:19:47 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.187.72 with SMTP id fq8mr15619273wic.26.1385936386827; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 14:19:46 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id pr7si28328006wjc.164.2013.12.01.14.19.46 for ; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 14:19:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VnFHv-0003b1-JY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:14:51 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VnFHv-0003as-3W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:14:51 +0000 Received: from qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.40]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VnFHs-00082e-TB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:14:50 +0000 Received: from omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.71]) by qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id wMRf1m0011YDfWL54NEnNC; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:14:47 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta20.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id wNEm1m00U0CFS1j3gNEmk7; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:14:47 +0000 Message-ID: <008401ceeee2$beb16740$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <529BA730.9080104@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <529BA879.1070002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 17:14:46 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1385936087; bh=lrNMfZKvhDfF3vdAWhYFpD2GalVmL1/lDAqW7AyAGzU=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=aOsjalOLvkcxum/sOyz5/exqCcJgh4DCAAjgRXKIV5NEHyezgJdTDH68ANVm5UZC9 +4MCrO/7Fxn+2iaxt2IkxSkKkxCuVojD0uvox8nnwSYNPLVA3Jg6vzOZQHSU1M9LD7 uOfcrjV0F7+U0m0LzF1jo7ax6CF7vqNeLz3eNoSG+h0rzo1pvGQ1YbgQf0mq9TK2Xz snZsgt3iMYwaVOUXemGZsI73Uz+qUd4K24Yj+kccHYUXU+4PzuZ/wxEa+MrcZk6r5u WrqzSA8pinLf+4mWnw9g8+ltsLSChuvoxGYhszcHqrTqfYq7JbK795XUZJ5Knmk5/0 7IrphlFd7Uaog== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Signal off to a good start tonight ... http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html ... 20 dB s/n in 28 mHz. Doesn't appear that the new buildings are hurting your signal too much. Curious ... did they affect the tuning? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: bb61bee384896e075004ae5ec954ddd2 Subject: LF: Re: LF tonite Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-2"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 903 Stefan Signal off to a good start tonight ... http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html ... 20 dB s/n in 28 mHz. Doesn't appear that the new buildings are hurting your signal too much. Curious ... did they affect the tuning? Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2013 4:22 PM Subject: LF: LF tonite > LF, > > I'll leave the digital stuff and switch over to traditional DFCW-90 on 136.172 kHz until about 8 > UTC. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >