Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 654A6380000B4; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:00:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TFWng-0004MH-HL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:59:44 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TFWnf-0004M7-Tp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:59:43 +0100 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TFWnd-0000E8-OP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:59:42 +0100 Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so2897628wib.4 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:59:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=reply-to:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language :x-gm-message-state; bh=nvpEkEU0gTkXIcF7M3wwGaTTV6LpVR+GF3z5uR+TwtQ=; b=O1GpmozdH+bF0yoXlMPhJxhnzEPATye4ExkxGVLaNg8xZAUpMA4vFj374Q5gbenNMB hPTESDAUN2fBVtlVzbBCOQVVLJ+rHy/2kPZcfhVxu2jxhkAb1NtYK2Q6WdGcPJAGDeAe bv4qpGXcsNiOd6OUQ14m3/OalktiFUiSQa7FrDjiBSKe8ZH1YdMcuBZYY5KRAJEb9W3n fo4+XvCrvymabpMlSDCok2Wunp7jlx4nkipKZkTpy+FoLLSB55BBeaERjdLQ7wFZ5CQN fN90f02IpuS7FM9MPs51WFKXBZYcXx+CZ+y0hV2EgaKtk2iirbNsdFO0YMuDEE6+d4Oe tYEw== Received: by 10.216.136.157 with SMTP id w29mr4830021wei.148.1348347580594; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.136.157 with SMTP id w29mr4830013wei.148.1348347580266; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Win7Pro (host86-132-15-36.range86-132.btcentralplus.com. [86.132.15.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v3sm5599785wiw.7.2012.09.22.13.59.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:59:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Terry GW0EZY To: References: <41E179E8BC3D497AB344D966959A61C6@White> <505D0DB5.4080108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <386BA5055A494FEC9164314A593DCB8D@White> <50165E49B10D41C59417AB37FE3CE771@White> In-Reply-To: <50165E49B10D41C59417AB37FE3CE771@White> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 21:59:37 +0100 Message-ID: <008401cd9905$2e2a9040$8a7fb0c0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac2Y+8acEYkfLcplRPGYmDUabrs0sAACNqtw Content-Language: en-gb X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmT4c9EcDlJRdbHXfjfsUt0u2bE/S4i/hAg8vh53ewHDZ48geCXQpOaOA0d268Gthlgb7yxX2pouBtgaArZs0omQjOEfRbIC8PzuFWC+8l/Z0rHPJXfJHyeVhpUXm6R/yzPh/58W4RHbmVo2OG1/IUFy0sB7QQo9ofDS45nlbmPsL/WJq7FzQzIKP4LaoRUvbSLiDJ+ X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Markus & Stefan Just came back in the shack and saw your message. For some reason WSPR still not sending spots to WSPRnet so here are my reports up to 20:00. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.212.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: a4bb99c845ef4b0e8bc113c5f6138ed3 Subject: LF: RE: WSPR-8 tests: QSY to 136.164 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0085_01CD990D.8FEEF840" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4090505e26e83a79 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0085_01CD990D.8FEEF840 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Markus & Stefan Just came back in the shack and saw your message. For some reason WSPR still not sending spots to WSPRnet so here are my reports up to 20:00. 73 Terry 1828 -2 0.8 0.137427 0 DK7FC JN49 30 1838 -14 0.5 0.137467 0 DF6NM JN59 27 1848 -1 0.6 0.137427 0 DK7FC JN49 30 1858 -13 0.6 0.137467 0 DF6NM JN59 27 1908 2 0.6 0.137427 0 DK7FC JN49 30 1918 -13 0.6 0.137467 0 DF6NM JN59 27 1928 3 0.5 0.137427 0 DK7FC JN49 30 1938 -14 0.6 0.137467 0 DF6NM JN59 27 1948 1 0.3 0.137427 0 DK7FC JN49 30 1958 -16 0.3 0.137467 0 DF6NM JN59 27 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Markus Vester Sent: 22 September 2012 20:49 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Cc: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk Subject: LF: WSPR-8 tests: QSY to 136.164 kHz Stefan and I have decided that we want to continue the WSPR-8 test transmissions tonight, but we intend to QSY below the Eu slot after 20:00 UT. We will stay with the alternate time slots (DK7FC at 0, 20, 40 minutes, DF6NM at 10, 30, 50 minutes), but will both use the same transmit frequency 136.164 kHz (RF, not dial). We hope that this will ease the task for possible stateside receivers. Existing monitors will not have to restart the batch script, but only change the audio frequency in the little SndInput window. Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: Markus Vester Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 9:36 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Experimental software for WSPR-8 and -32 Hi Stefan, sorry, only just started the RX before 7 UT. So here's your decode, delayed by 10 minutes... 2012-09-22 07:10 DK7FC 0.137429 +12 0 JN49ik 1 DF6NM/8 JN59nj 175 91 The offset was shown as DT = -0.5 so timing is perfect. As you said, slow DX work should be split band. From here I would send close to the Eu slot, for example in a 10 Hz subband from 136.155 to 136.165 kHz. And perhaps 137.765 to 137.775 kHz for TA west-to-east, which would be in a DCF39 gap. This setup would also allow to merge the accelerated output with the "normal WSPR" band 137.4 to 137.6 kHz. Best 73 Markus, DF6NM ... ------=_NextPart_000_0085_01CD990D.8FEEF840 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Markus & Stefan

 

Just came back in the shack and saw your message. =

 

For some reason WSPR still not sending spots to WSPRnet so here are = my reports up to 20:00.

 

73 Terry

 

1828  -2  0.8   0.137427  0 DK7FC JN49 = 30

1838 -14  0.5   0.137467  0 DF6NM JN59 = 27

1848  -1  0.6   0.137427  0 DK7FC JN49 = 30

1858 -13  0.6   0.137467  0 DF6NM JN59 = 27

1908   2  0.6   0.137427  0 DK7FC JN49 = 30

1918 -13  0.6   0.137467  0 DF6NM JN59 = 27

1928   3  0.5   0.137427  0 DK7FC JN49 = 30

1938 -14  0.6   0.137467  0 DF6NM JN59 = 27

1948   1  0.3   0.137427  0 DK7FC JN49 = 30

1958 -16  0.3   0.137467  0 DF6NM JN59 = 27

 

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Markus = Vester
Sent: 22 September 2012 20:49
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Cc: = rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk
Subject: LF: WSPR-8 tests: QSY = to 136.164 kHz

 

Stefan = and I have decided that we want to continue the WSPR-8 test = transmissions tonight, but we intend to QSY below the Eu slot = after 20:00 UT. We will stay with the alternate time slots = (DK7FC at 0, 20, 40 minutes, DF6NM at 10, 30, 50 minutes), but will = both use the same transmit frequency 136.164 kHz (RF, = not dial). We hope that this will ease the task for possible stateside = receivers. Existing monitors will not have to restart the batch script, = but only change the audio frequency in the little SndInput = window.

 

Best = 73,

Markus = (DF6NM)

 

 <= /o:p>

From:= = Markus Vester =

Sent:= = Saturday, September 22, 2012 9:36 AM

Subject: Re: LF: = Experimental software for WSPR-8 and = -32

 

Hi = Stefan,<= /span>

 <= /o:p>

sorry, only = just started the RX  before 7 UT. So here's your decode, = delayed by 10 minutes...<= /span>

 <= /o:p>

2012-09-22 = 07:10   DK7FC   0.137429   +12   = 0   JN49ik   1   DF6NM/8   = JN59nj   175   91  <= /span>

 <= /o:p>

The = offset was shown as DT =3D -0.5 so timing is = perfect.<= /span>

 <= /o:p>

As you said, = slow DX work should be split band. From here I = would send close to the Eu slot, for example in a 10 = Hz subband from 136.155 to 136.165 kHz. And perhaps 137.765 to = 137.775 kHz for TA west-to-east, which would be in a DCF39 = gap. This setup would also allow to merge the accelerated = output with the "normal WSPR" band 137.4 to = 137.6 kHz.<= /span>

 <= /o:p>

Best = 73<= /span>

Markus, = DF6NM<= /span>

 <= /o:p>

 ...<= /span>

------=_NextPart_000_0085_01CD990D.8FEEF840--