Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp362316igc; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:07:18 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.21.101 with SMTP id u5mr20796418wie.38.1387843637613; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:07:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hm9si2817159wjc.105.2013.12.23.16.07.17 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:07:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VvFD6-00007g-W1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:46:56 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VvFD6-00007X-8f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:46:56 +0000 Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.32]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VvFD2-0007Th-3B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:46:55 +0000 Received: from omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.43]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 5BY61n0060vp7WLA3Bmp5F; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:46:49 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.137.182.216]) by omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 5BmP1n0074gYbxS8RBmU8e; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 23:46:44 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: <005a01cf002d$00126e90$00374bb0$@comcast.net> <7D1D9D5B19734F49A4322B1DB466E813@White> In-Reply-To: <7D1D9D5B19734F49A4322B1DB466E813@White> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:46:17 -0700 Message-ID: <008301cf0039$38fe9ce0$aafbd6a0$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQICwcmh1/K39OCFM7dDJesh5Qss1QKWN28mAawH1Y2Z2NeocA== Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1387842409; bh=q1edlTyUMf/5bVrBtfRB/osAP4A46ebloC9Ww40il9c=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=L35plHgCyr+2MUJrWb6zEdSgJWz0GG6MJRj78N4aDCKkgWUHv67FxlsOt0jJx4eh/ EklWwmbm16FGk3b5R1/TeHHaxlWjUHdhRUCuicSNj6PBc0Yqw86Mn5czJWUF3KAnXA cj5eKxnE9jfu55Yojib+DMOEMCyUvK0bDoKlyBuqb9EOAXT0b5s4DvxNB/y4nAEr2f bWT4XrnEpD7AoWLyztEs4Gvq1DyUnPFnu3VR/jCK3mdgTlae/AYVfzPCfmOmvGD/x0 K52DPLNzDp6Wof8NjolfCCeAlNjCJcabtIgGIm7e0ygcO0eFpRhjV1qIGTm9h/TpI2 i83PO4OahjDZQ== X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank you Markus, They are a stealthy lot so the extra eyes on are much appreciated (hope only Uwe reads this at his end). I don't see any signs of perambulation 17 - 21 UT so I will add another layer of noise mitigation. [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.30.32 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 280b6f92979e78e2e1f858016e075ea9 Subject: RE: VLF: 8969.99 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0084_01CEFFFE.8CA12470" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1769 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01CEFFFE.8CA12470 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thank you Markus, They are a stealthy lot so the extra eyes on are much appreciated (hope only Uwe reads this at his end). I don't see any signs of perambulation 17 - 21 UT so I will add another layer of noise mitigation. Thanks very much for the help. 73, Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Markus Vester Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 3:45 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99 Hi Jim, didn't see the cat myself, he was betrayed to me by others Lubos http://www.ok2bvg.cz/vlfgrabber/ Paul http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=1387832400 &b=080&s=sp Peter http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/ Stefan http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html Apparently Uwe's cat's carrier was on air today from 17 to 21 UT, but not this morning. Unfortunately my own grabber is too noisy to catch much of it, except for the odd bright pixel. 73 and good luck, Markus (DF6NM) From: hvanesce Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:18 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: VLF: 8969.99 Uwe and Markus, Was he out from about 02:15 to 03:15? I'm trying to interpret using Markus' grabber. Hope springs eternal here that with management of natural noise, continuous monitoring and luck I might detect TA signals. I was making receiver modifications for noise mitigation (i.e. receiver off) approximately 01:00 - 10:00. If I had known that it wasn't raining at 0200 I would postponed my receiver noise modifications. I am running multiple windows at different bandwidths (thanks everyone for your previous advice on this) to enhance the chance of detection with arbitrary on/off (rain/dry) periods. 73, Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 1:59 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99 Yes, Markus, but he is back agn. GL, Uwe _____ Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 23.12.2013 20:52 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: VLF: 8969.99 _____ Hey Uwe, your cat's on walkabout again! 73, Markus ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01CEFFFE.8CA12470 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thank you Markus,

 

They are a stealthy lot so the extra eyes on are much appreciated = (hope only Uwe reads this at his end).

 

I don’t see any signs of perambulation 17 – 21 UT so I = will add another layer of noise mitigation.

 

Thanks very much for the help.

 

73, Jim AA5BW

 

From:= = owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Markus = Vester
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 3:45 PM
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: VLF: = 8969.99

 

Hi = Jim,

 

didn't see = the cat myself, he was betrayed to me by = others

 

<= div>

Paul http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=3D1387832400&b=3D080&= ;s=3Dsp

 

Apparently&nb= sp;Uwe's cat's carrier was on air today from 17 to 21 UT, but not this = morning. Unfortunately my own grabber is too noisy to catch much of = it, except for the odd bright pixel.

 

73 and good = luck,

Markus = (DF6NM)

 

 <= /o:p>

From:= = hvanesce =

Sent:= = Monday, December 23, 2013 11:18 PM

Subject: RE: VLF: = 8969.99

 

Uwe and Markus,

 

Was he out from about 02:15 to 03:15? I’m trying to interpret = using Markus’ grabber.

 

Hope springs eternal here that with management of natural noise, = continuous monitoring and luck I might detect TA signals. I was making = receiver modifications for noise mitigation (i.e. receiver off) = approximately 01:00 – 10:00. If I had known that it wasn’t = raining at 0200 I would postponed my receiver noise = modifications.

 

I am running multiple windows at different bandwidths (thanks = everyone for your previous advice on this) to enhance the chance of = detection with arbitrary on/off (rain/dry) = periods.

 

73, Jim AA5BW

 

 

 

 

 

From:= = owner-rsgb_lf_group@bl= acksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_g= roup@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de
= Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 1:59 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99

 

Yes, Markus, = but he is back agn.
GL, Uwe

Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Gesendet: 23.12.2013 20:52
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Betreff: VLF: 8969.99

 

Hey Uwe, = your cat's on walkabout again!  73, = Markus

 

------=_NextPart_000_0084_01CEFFFE.8CA12470--