Return-Path: Received: (qmail 96860 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2005 09:35:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 3 Mar 2005 09:35:24 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D6mle-000Ox4-ER for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:37:18 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.3] (helo=ptb-mxcore03.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D6mle-000Ox0-7c for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:37:14 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1D6mlc-0004cK-R2 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:37:12 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1D6mjN-0002BW-62 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:34:53 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1D6mjI-00028g-J5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:34:48 +0000 Received: from mta204-rme.xtra.co.nz ([210.86.15.147]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6mjF-0007GD-OW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:34:48 +0000 Received: from pop2-rme.xtra.co.nz ([210.86.15.240]) by mta204-rme.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP id <20050303093438.LNQM23939.mta204-rme.xtra.co.nz@pop2-rme.xtra.co.nz> for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:34:38 +1300 Received: from quaycustomer ([210.86.83.14]) by pop2-rme.xtra.co.nz with SMTP id <20050303093437.BABY16943.pop2-rme.xtra.co.nz@quaycustomer> for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:34:37 +1300 Message-ID: <008201c51fd5$8158c220$c401a8c0@quaycustomer> From: "Vernall" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <6.1.0.6.2.20050301115700.03662eb0@mail.casema.nl> <004d01c51e98$ec121f00$c401a8c0@quaycustomer> <000601c51f6a$c8687310$e901a8c0@bob2l2u6k2n1g3> <004601c51fd1$5aade960$0d540150@p2300> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:43:48 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of xtra.co.nz designates 210.86.15.147 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Current "lost" in loading coil Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Bryan, Having a tapped coil is one way to feeding/matching to 50 ohms, and my experience (for 181 kHz) is that around 2 or 3 turns is about right. I now prefer feeding the coax inner to the cold end of the coil and earthing the braid to the "earth mat". When tuned the resistance presented varies with ground loss, but can be matched down or up with either an autotransformer or L match. My input about "Q times" is based on the feeder connected to the cold end, and no tapping. However, a tapped coil is only a variation for feeding power to it, and the discussion about current "going sideways" via stray capacitance is still a fact of life. If you do measurements, use very low power, otherwise you will fry the probe. 73, Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "captbrian" To: Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 10:14 PM Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Current "lost" in loading coil > Thanks Vernall but.. > > <<"it will be some Q times the voltage applied at the "cold end". ">> > > > > Where would you measure this? ..... there isnt any "voltage applied at the > cold end". [It is plugged into the finest earth that cunning hams can > devise.] The voltage at the "colder " end depends where you tap (if that is > how you feed )? Or am I wrong ? > > If fed with a coupling coil I confess I am lost . > > Bryan 50 50 N / 00 16W > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Vernall > To: > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 8:58 PM > Subject: LF: Re: Re: Current "lost" in loading coil > > > > Hi all, > > > > The discussion has brought out some interesting points on what goes on in > a > > practical loading coil. I would like to investigate (measure) some vector > > relationships of current and voltage on a practical setup, but in the > > meantime I am occupied with preparing for an LF DX weekend at Quartz Hill, > > so it will be a while till I can find time to do quantitative testing. > I'm > > interested to find out if maximum current in to the "cold end" of the > > loading coil corresponds with maximum radiation (far field, not near > field) > > from the system (system being not only the wire connected to the "hot end" > > of the loading coil). > > > > One can expect a big difference in relationships between tuned and > untuned. > > When tuned (the usual situation for LF transmitting) one can expect an > > approximate linear voltage rise (similar volts per turn) and at the top > "hot > > end" it will be some Q times the voltage applied at the "cold end". If > > there is similar stray capacitance per turn, then the current "lost" has > an > > approximate linear distribution up the coil, as "lost current" is > > proportional to driving voltage, which increases along the coil. > > > > There will also be a phase shift due to physical length of wire in the > > inductor, with 360 degrees corresponding to a wavelength (even for > applying > > DC, there is a finite time from applying excitation at one end till > current > > comes out the other end, it is the "propagation delay" that forms the > phase > > shift for steady state sinewave excitation). A coil winding length of 100 > > metres of wire is about 4.5% of a wavelength, or some 16 degrees for 136 > > kHz. The stray capacitance will of course modify the ideal situation of > the > > 16 degrees being proportional to length along the winding, especially > around > > the upper part of a resonant coil where the voltage is highest. > > > > 73, Bob ZL2CA > > > > > > > > > >