Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 20B1F38000083; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 07:52:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbVoc-0002bW-79 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:51:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbVob-0002bN-P6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:51:17 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbVoZ-0006FB-Ef for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:51:16 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AowKAFGgzE9cF/Mu/2dsb2JhbABFhU6EL5lYjyYEgSaBCIITBQEBBAEIAQEDFg8BIwImBgEBAwUCAQMRBAEBAQICBSECAhQBBAgSBgwKCAYTCgECAgEBAYV/gWwDBgkHpASIOgMKiU6BI4kOYE6CLIIEgRIDjT2IbYlshHuCYIFf X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,712,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="540278782" Received: from host-92-23-243-46.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.243.46]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 04 Jun 2012 12:51:13 +0100 Message-ID: <008001cd4248$56a98080$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <4FCB7397.8020204@legal-medicine.de> <52B3B4B4EF37485981A74C2FBC74AEA2@AGB> <4FCBD854.5080003@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <120D17A5-6D9A-4AED-B46F-F784E7EA4A28@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 11:51:11 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: What I would like to see is a VOTE taking place openly on both reflectors for all to SEE ie TRANSPARENT and DEMOCRATIC and not a closed shop approach on one reflector. Let the 155 subscribers please VOTE openly G3KEV [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.242 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.5 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: b08ad821341ca291e1fd930f7b9292d3 Subject: Re: LF: Poll announcement Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=GET_STARTED_NOW autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:481009088:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60584fcca1724b2c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none What I would like to see is a VOTE taking place openly on both reflectors for all to SEE ie TRANSPARENT and DEMOCRATIC and not a closed shop approach on one reflector. Let the 155 subscribers please VOTE openly G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Lapthorn" To: Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 9:43 PM Subject: Re: LF: Poll announcement The poll is open until June 11th Stefan! 73s Roger -- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver -- On 3 Jun 2012, at 22:34, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > It wasn't possible to take part in the poll even after subscribing. So this cannot be serious! Apart from the democratic conflict which is see too. > I think the different opinions are clear after that day. > Now i want to focus on amateur radio again, whatever the frequency might be. > > Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 03.06.2012 16:29, schrieb Graham: >> Slight democratic conflict .. you have to be a member of the yahoo group to vote , therefore you have a declared interests in yahoo , so this should exclude your vote from the poll .... >> >> G. >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "pws" >> Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 3:24 PM >> To: >> Subject: Re: LF: Poll announcement >> >>> John, >>> >>> You wrote: >>>> ... >>>> Now that you've had a chance to try the Yahoo! Groups list, >>>> how do you want to continue? >>>> >>>> o With the Yahoo! Groups list >>>> o With the Blacksheep.org list >>>> o Both lists >>>> >>>> >>>> To vote, please visit the following web page: >>>> http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/surveys?id=13140385 >>> >>> I got what expected: >>> """ >>> To enjoy this Web-only feature of rsgb_lf_group, you need to enable Web Access. >>> >>> With Web Access, you'll enjoy your group's online photos, polls, links, message archive search, and more! >>> >>> Get Web Access to rsgb_lf_group >>> >>> If you already receive email from rsgb_lf_group, it's easy to get Web Access and make your Yahoo! Group experience complete. >>> >>> To activate Web Access for rsgb_lf_group, click "Get Started Now". >>> >>> Not a Member of rsgb_lf_group? >>> If you are not currently a member of rsgb_lf_group, join this group now. >>> """ >>> >>> No, thanks! >>> I'm voting for the continuity of this reflector. That's all. >>> >>> Peter, df3lp >>> >