Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from rly-ma08.mx.aol.com (rly-ma08.mail.aol.com [172.20.116.52]) by air-ma06.mail.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILINMA061-8c04a980e41c0; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:05:24 -0400
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-ma08.mx.aol.com (v125.7) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINMA082-8c04a980e41c0; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:05:07 -0400
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1Mh4rt-0005Tf-Vl
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:04:05 +0100
Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1Mh4rt-0005TW-F0
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:04:05 +0100
Received: from ttsmtp-3.cpwnetworks.com ([62.24.128.244] helo=ttsmtp.cpwnetworks.com)
	by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>)
	id 1Mh4rm-0001MQ-En
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:04:00 +0100
X-Path: TalkTalk-smtp
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAGaql0pZ8ob1/2dsb2JhbACEedYFgieBcgU
Received: from unknown (HELO mal769a60aa920) ([89.242.134.245])
  by ttsmtp.cpwnetworks.com with SMTP; 28 Aug 2009 18:03:52 +0100
Message-ID: <007e01ca2801$85412d80$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920>
From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <9afca2640908261406r3ced27fr31bbca942848a291@mail.gmail.com> <005701ca2707$438a4570$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <9afca2640908270502q3136dd1cjf52d2666eedeed94@mail.gmail.com> <009c01ca2731$2d5e0e60$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <9afca2640908271133v7eea7f18r7855a822514399a4@mail.gmail.com> <847F3A04E31C413A81AD022BDC11AD46@JimPC>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:03:52 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency?
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20


Jim
It is a pity you cannot stick to the subject, instead you launch a personal 
attack. For someone that has not progressed beyond basic entry level CW you 
are not in a position to compare the merits of CW v other non morse modes.
Who are 'us guys'
An apology would not go amiss.
mal/g3kev

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Moritz" <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency?


> Dear Roger, LF Group,
>
> Please bear in mind that G3KEV does not speak for "us guys", only himself.
> Over the years we have learned to ignore him most of the time - if we took
> much notice, we would all have given up a long time ago.
>
> If you look in the WSPR on-line database specifying the band as "LF/VLF",
> you will see that there has been quite a lot of WSPR activity over the 
> last
> year on 136k and 500k, which has been one of the more successful digital
> modes in this part of the spectrum. The points you make regarding narrow
> bandwidth and low power are certainly useful at LF/MF. The summer months 
> are
> usually rather lacking in activity due to the short nights and high QRN, 
> but
> activity, no doubt including WSPR, will be picking up soon as we get into
> autumn.
>
> The M0BMU LF/MF station is currently QRT due to a recent visit from
> relatives - all those pretty coloured wires and 3-year-olds don't really
> mix! It will probably be put back together this weekend though, so if you
> are interested in trying WSPR on 136k or 500k, let me know.
>
> Cheers, Jim Moritz
> 73 de M0BMU
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Roger Lapthorn" <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 7:33 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency?
>
>
> ...But it's *not* my place to tell you guys how to use the LF bands so 
> with
>> this, I'll leave you to it and get back on 10m WSPR, CW and SSB.  Good
>> luck
>> with whatever modes you enjoy.
>>
>> Roger
>> 73s
>> G3XBM
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.69/2328 - Release Date: 08/26/09 
12:16:00