Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16670 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 19:18:47 -0000 Received: from murphys.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.225) by mailstore with SMTP; 10 Apr 2003 19:18:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 17389 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2003 19:18:35 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by murphys.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Apr 2003 19:18:35 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 193hYp-0003fo-5l for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 20:18:11 +0100 Received: from [66.27.141.37] (helo=momsnu1) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 193hYk-0003ez-2K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 20:18:06 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.12] by momsnu1 (ArGoSoft Mail Server for Windows NT/2000, Version 1.4 (1.4.0.5)); Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:17:34 -0700 Message-ID: <007d01c2ff95$d767a8a0$0c00a8c0@home> From: "DTX" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001601c2ff6f$156fdae0$9cccfc3e@l8p8y6> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:17:34 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: CE Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,REFERENCESversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
As well as GE for General "Enquiry" fron Laurie, how about AE for Any Exchange?  A dot and a dash shorter.
 
Gary WA6DTX
----- Original Message -----
From: hamilton mal
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 7:30 AM
Subject: LF: CE

Hi all
On QRS mode CQ takes up a lot of non productive time. I am going to try instead CE which is unique and does not clash with any other bit of amateur procedure. ie CE G3KEV K
Those that see me using the above procedure on QRS mode will know that I am calling CQ  and can respond accordingly.
If anyone has an opinion on the above for or against pse comment. On normal CW I wll continue with the established CQ.
73 de G3KEV/IO94SH