Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D19B63800009C; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:15:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QrDH5-0004Gl-RI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:13:03 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QrDH5-0004Gc-DI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:13:03 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QrDH3-0005uN-63 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:13:03 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoIBAODIQk5Ok8bM/2dsb2JhbABCk20DhABEjwF4gTsFAQEFCAEBAzwNAiwBAQMFAgEDBA0EAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYdfvnKGRgSCUIRelUyGfQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309734000"; d="scan'208,217";a="509006264" Received: from host-78-147-198-204.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.198.204]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 10 Aug 2011 19:12:54 +0100 Message-ID: <007601cc5789$19d38390$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <4E418609.6020500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de><67A6F7BF45BF4A0193A3DCB53000A283@PcMinto><008401cc56ce$2f1fb2c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><12C475F3F4C84B818461753F2E8A60A6@PcMinto><4E41AECB.90808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de><8D68749D37B94275855FDBA46A3F6C97@PcMinto><4E427DFB.50801@iup.uni-heidelberg.de><0FA38FC9F88F41738D007D00C0B66503@PcMinto><002e01cc5772$40601a30$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><09706552FC574901BA413DC5295F48F5@AGB><004e01cc5780$a98a3820$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><006601cc5784$f636d530$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:12:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: HB9ASB... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0073_01CC5791.7B636E10" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:433584384:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60154e42caab4112 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01CC5791.7B636E10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Let us hear from the man that is performing this trick !!!!!!! Could be circus stunt !! ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Andy Talbot=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:53 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: HB9ASB... If the only other element is the mast, and that's away from local QRM = it all works as it should. Not necesasrily anything like as bad as the = full length of the feeder contributing to pickup. And why's it "highly unlikely" the Tx isn't in the same box?. I'm = assuming, but I'd certainly try a licence-free 868MHz wideband FM link, = or a 2.4GHz FM TV one. They're tiny postage stamp sized modules, and = should offer enough dynamic range where no strong local stuff is nearby. Electronics has moved on since your day OM :-) Andy www.g4jnt.com On 10 August 2011 18:42, mal hamilton wrote: Andy Highly unlikely that the link-tx is in the same box, even so the = other element as u say would be the the mast/mounting and that could be = say 20 plus feet, just as bad as the feeder senario!! g3kev -----=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01CC5791.7B636E10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Let us hear from the man that is performing this = trick=20 !!!!!!!
Could be circus stunt !!
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Andy=20 Talbot
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, = 2011 6:53=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: = HB9ASB...

If the only other element is the mast, and that's away from local = QRM it=20 all works as it should.  Not necesasrily anything like as bad as = the full=20 length of the feeder contributing to pickup.
 
And why's it "highly unlikely" the Tx isn't in the same = box?.  =20 I'm assuming, but I'd certainly try a licence-free 868MHz wideband FM = link, or=20 a 2.4GHz FM TV one.  They're tiny postage stamp sized modules, = and should=20 offer enough dynamic range where no strong local stuff is = nearby.
 
Electronics has moved on since your day OM :-)
 
Andy
 
 
On 10 August 2011 18:42, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>=20 wrote:
Andy
Highly unlikely that the link-tx is in the = same box,=20 even so the other element as u say would be the the mast/mounting = and that=20 could be say 20 plus feet,  just as bad as the feeder=20 senario!!
g3kev
 
-----=20 =
------=_NextPart_000_0073_01CC5791.7B636E10--