Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C835338000089; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:38:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TWomY-0001TL-Qr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 13:38:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TWomY-0001TC-EI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 13:38:02 +0000 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TWomW-0002yz-QX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 13:38:01 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah8UAHEGnVBcF/mT/2dsb2JhbABEike3fwEDf4EJghkFAQEFCAEBA0kCLAEBAwUCAQMRBAEBCiUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQGHfb0wjBJQHAgNHIIGgyUDiCWFT5hKgm8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,745,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="404594850" Received: from host-92-23-249-147.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.249.147]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 09 Nov 2012 13:37:59 +0000 Message-ID: <007301cdbe7f$6e89c8a0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <509C1990.5000208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <003d01cdbe5a$b25bff00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 13:37:58 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.8 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Doug Will ur grabber be on tonite around 2000 utc for a bit. 136.173 Khz mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Szymanski" To: Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 11:54 AM Subject: Re: LF: Re: DCF39 in Japan [...] Content analysis details: (3.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 3.8 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 4e3b1488273adbbe9757d6bdd5adf219 Subject: Re: LF: Re: DCF39 in Japan Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad2509d07712d35 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Doug Will ur grabber be on tonite around 2000 utc for a bit. 136.173 Khz mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Szymanski" To: Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 11:54 AM Subject: Re: LF: Re: DCF39 in Japan Mal, what time were you transmitting? I had about 20 minutes of signal around your frequency at sunrise here. I also had reception of DCF and HGA last night. Please check my grabber later. 73 de George DU1GM On Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:15:00 -0000, you wrote: >Stefan >I started up on 136.173.5 but noticed the JA grabber and the RN3 grabber >were OFF so I went QRT. Condx were good both on LF es MF yesterday > An opportunity missed but there will be another time also the YV grabber >sensitivity looks too low for weak signal detection. > > de mal/g3kev