Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 07105380000AD; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 03:26:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TT6DG-0008EL-0Z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:26:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TT6DF-0008EC-Ft for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:26:13 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-02.simnet.is ([194.105.232.27]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TT6DC-00064L-0c for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:26:12 +0000 Authentication-Results: smtp-out-02.simnetpro.is; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none X-SBRS: 2.9 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmsCAEp/j1DCaehEgWdsb2JhbABEgkrBEQEBFiYXEIIeAQEFCAIeBVkFGgQBASggLQkJAQQTCwWHbQ0HmnuRE4F3jiYEi3WGXQOIJI1QhVaJDoRN X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,677,1344211200"; d="scan'208,217";a="828481850" Received: from z-proxy-02.simnet.is (HELO mail.simnet.is) ([194.105.232.68]) by smtp-out-02.simnetpro.is with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2012 07:26:07 +0000 Received: from tomasarhagi (85-220-9-104.dsl.dynamic.simnet.is [85.220.9.104]) by mail.simnet.is (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50964900F8 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:26:07 +0000 (GMT) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Halld=F3r?= To: Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:26:23 -0000 Message-ID: <007201cdb66f$dd4abbe0$97e033a0$@simnet.is> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac22b6fTCVFr1tNYRauJW5EcwWtUIw== Content-Language: is X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Got the following decodes in JT9-5. 0010 10 -12 0.9 1442.90 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 0020 10 -9 0.9 1442.93 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK [...] Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [194.105.232.27 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f9f85a03ab18710b130c40acc03380f0 Subject: LF: DK7FC JT9-5 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0073_01CDB66F.DD4D2CE0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, LINES_OF_YELLING,LINES_OF_YELLING_2,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600e508f813d4743 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01CDB66F.DD4D2CE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Got the following decodes in JT9-5. =20 0010 10 -12 0.9 1442.90 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 0020 10 -9 0.9 1442.93 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 73 Halld=F3r TF3HZ From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer Sent: 30. okt=F3ber 2012 00:46 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC JT9-5 =20 Thanks Markus,=20 Unbelivable: I got my first decode in JT9! https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/JT9-5.png DX distance is 20m!! :-) It was received on a Win7 PC. I used my /p LF receiver which uses the = same concept as the grabber RX, a 125 kHz LO, fixed. So i also had to use the same software, i.e. SL to shift the frequency (-11300 Hz), then VAC and = then JT9-5. So obviously it has either to do with the software that is used and/or = the CPU performance. On my other PC, there are 6 SL instances running = 24/365, also JT9 and VAC. Sometimes the CPU load is 100%. Maybe this causes the non-decodes. But it was no problem for WSPR! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 30.10.2012 01:29, schrieb Markus Vester:=20 Getting somewhat more regular JT9-5 decodes now from Stefan, and also = saw DF2JP. I did switch off the built-in noiseblanker before 23:50. This = seemed to further devastate the displayed SNR values, but perhaps improved = signal integrity for the decodes? =20 2340 10 -9 0.0 1939.84 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 2345 10 -23 0.2 1939.84 0.00 2350 10 -26 0.2 1939.84 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 0000 10 -26 0.2 1939.84 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 0010 10 -27 0.0 1939.84 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK =20 0015 3 -30 0.0 1956.90 0.00 DF2JP JO31JG =20 0020 10 -9 0.0 1939.88 0.00 =20 73 & good luck, Markus (DF6NM) ------=_NextPart_000_0073_01CDB66F.DD4D2CE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Got the following decodes in JT9-5.

 

0010=A0 10=A0 -12=A0=A0 0.9 1442.90=A0 0.00=A0=A0=A0 DK7FC = JN49IK=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0

0020=A0 10=A0=A0 -9=A0=A0 0.9 1442.93=A0 0.00=A0=A0=A0 DK7FC = JN49IK=A0

73

Halld=F3r

TF3HZ

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: 30. okt=F3ber 2012 00:46
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC = JT9-5

 

Thanks = Markus,

Unbelivable: I got my first decode in JT9! https://dl.dropbo= x.com/u/19882028/LF/JT9-5.png  DX distance is 20m!! = :-)

It was received on a Win7 PC. I used my /p LF receiver which = uses the same concept as the grabber RX, a 125 kHz LO, fixed. So i also = had to use the same software, i.e. SL to shift the frequency (-11300 = Hz), then VAC and then JT9-5.

So obviously it has either to do = with the software that is used and/or the CPU performance. On my other = PC, there are 6 SL instances running 24/365, also JT9 and VAC. Sometimes = the CPU load is 100%. Maybe this causes the non-decodes. But it was no = problem for WSPR!

73, Stefan/DK7FC






Am = 30.10.2012 01:29, schrieb Markus Vester:

Getting = somewhat more regular JT9-5 decodes now from Stefan, and also saw DF2JP. = I did switch off the built-in noiseblanker before 23:50. This seemed to = further devastate the displayed SNR values, but perhaps improved signal = integrity for the decodes?

 

2340  = 10   -9   0.0 1939.84  0.00    = DK7FC JN49IK         =
2345  10  -23   0.2 1939.84  = 0.00
2350  10  -26   0.2 1939.84  = 0.00    DK7FC = JN49IK        
0000  = 10  -26   0.2 1939.84  0.00    DK7FC = JN49IK        
0010  = 10  -27   0.0 1939.84  0.00    DK7FC = JN49IK         =
0015   3  -30   0.0 1956.90  = 0.00   DF2JP = JO31JG        <= /p>

0020  = 10   -9   0.0 1939.88  = 0.00

 

73 & = good luck,

Markus = (DF6NM)

------=_NextPart_000_0073_01CDB66F.DD4D2CE0--