Message-ID: <007201cd2bac$dddba0e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <FE434AB14D2442DA9517B6F7304CE6E3@AGB> <FB72BFCD7B564064B0C93A0FD2DA9448@Extensa> <4F97E9C2.9030000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <CAA8k23REzyvnLSkQGwzh4ckSFTeSFSPQkUMD2z-K9-YTGZfxQw@mail.gmail.com> <7B23411450514A5CB804E6D2C65A1876@JimPC> <CAA8k23RmwKeotC8yWu3Xe_G5gEavk6cNP191Oiw62p70wVtNBg@mail.gmail.com> <006601cd2ba5$30f197b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <C0029B2C-5148-43BA-9052-B79BDA856D6D@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 17:22:51 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: Generating 8970 Hz carrier with Spectrum Lab ?
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404d4fa6b3b02694
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


I was wondering when you would SURFACE and appreciate your problem but the
simple solution for a dedicated underground Pipe chaser is to Move QTH.
Please moderate you language.

de G3KEV
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Lapthorn" <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Generating 8970 Hz carrier with Spectrum Lab ?


Mal, you are talking rubbish again.

Without frequency locking in SL and very very narrow bandwidths possible,
there is no way I would have been able to copy the EU VLF amateurs last year
in this semi-urban noise pool. Not many of us live in v.quiet rural areas.
You may be able to copy VLF DX at QRSS3 but most of us can not at any
distance.

Regarding VLF activity in the UK, I continue to do earth-mode tests although
I have been distracted to NLOS optical comms of late. Not sure if G3XIZ is
planning further radiated tests. Several stations including G3ZJO monitor EU
VLF tests regularly.

73s
Roger G3XBM


-- Via my 2.4GHz transceiver --

On 6 May 2012, at 17:26, "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:

> Andy
> All these complications to accommodate the Appliance Operator who cannot
> read MORSE or watch QRSS on a screen.
> g3kev
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Talbot" <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 4:14 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: Generating 8970 Hz carrier with Spectrum Lab ?
>
>
> The problem with USB slippage comes about because of the Isochronos
> mode (yes, that is spelt correctly, it is not IsoSYNchronous)   -
> where it sends puts real time rapid data transfer as more important
> than lost samples and sends samples in real time without checking
> This is probably just what music and audio people want, but it screws
> up using USB based sound cards as precision timed A/D converters.
> USB does have other modes with full error checking, albeit with some
> latency, but the latency wouldn't matter here.
>
> While it would be a pretty simple task these days to build an external
> A/D converter and interface to USB properly, the resulting data stream
> would need a custom driver written, then all the decoding software we
> know and love would have to be modified to work with this custom
> interface.   Then someone else would come along with another design
> and we'd have to start again.
>
> I suspect it is going to be absolutely impossible to use the soundcard
> as a guaranteed glitch free A/D converter.
>
> Joe Taylor K1JT  in the WSJT suite has a dead simple pragmatic
> solution.   Instead of trying to read the data in real time, all the
> WSJT modes read the entire transmisisons' worth of data to a .WAV
> file, and the software works on that.   While WSJT  uses the soundcard
> to do the job it will suffer from the same slippages (which don't
> matter' of course' for those modes) the idea of an intermediate buffer
> file would help.
>
> A custom A/D could send its data in its own format via USB, or serial
> COM port or whatever, to software that saves blocks in the format of a
> .WAV file.  Then the decoding software works on the resulting .WAV
> files.   It won't be real time any more, but none of these slow data
> modes actually are that real time.  The speed of reading and switching
> (using a pair of ping-pong files if necessary) can make the whole
> system pseudo real time - in the same way as WSJT appears to run
> continuously.
>
> Now, any A/D design can be used provided the results are written to a
> .WAV file.   Wav files can have any sample rate (so long as it is an
> integer number of Hz) and do not have to be restricted to 48000, 11025
> or whatever, so custom LF receivers using quite slow A/D converters
> and low sample rates are now valid.
>
> Just throwing that idea into the ring..
>
> Andy
> www.g4jnt.com
>
>
> On 6 May 2012 16:14, James Moritz <james.moritz@btopenworld.com> wrote:
>> Dear Andy, LF Group,
>>
>> A bit late, but never mind...
>>
>>> Has anyone tried using an external USB soundcard with a separate
>>> locked clock? Most work from a 12MHz crystal which can be replaces
>>> with a GPS locked source without too much effort. But I can't help
>>> wondering if there will be subsequent USB synchronisation glitches
>>> upsetting the input sampling.
>>
>>
>>
>> I can confirm that glitches do occur with USB sound cards. I have found
> this
>> to be a perennial problem trying to use such a sound card with the
laptops
> I
>> have available. For 9kHz reception, the relatively rapid temperature
>> fluctuations inside the laptop, and resulting cyclic drift of the
internal
>> soundcard sampling frequency interfere with the operation of DL4YHF's
>> ingenious sample rate correction facility in SpecLab, making the internal
>> sound card unusable for FFT resolution below a few millihertz. I found my
>> USB soundcard solved this particular problem quite well, but introduced
>> glitches that made achieving FFT resolution in the uHz range impractical.
>>
>> Watching Speclab's sample rate correction "history" window, the USB card
>> sample rate typically starts off a few hundred ppm low (much larger than
> the
>> actual clock frequency error), but remaining stable to within a few ppm,
> but
>> then at unpredictable intervals abrupt jumps in sample rate of a similar
>> order of magnitude occur, with corresponding "blips" on the spectrogram
>> traces. The reported sample rate is always lower than the nominal value,
>> suggesting that some samples are being periodically discarded somehow.
>>
>> The sound card uses a single-chip integrated audio codec and USB
>> transceiver, using a single 12MHz crystal. I can't really believe in "USB
>> slippage" in the hardware - surely losing some of the data would either
be
>> handled quietly by the USB error checking, or result in endless error
>> messages. The same sound card seems to work in a glitch-free way when
>> plugged into my desktop machine, where the reported sample rate error is
> in
>> line with the error in the crystal frequency.
>>
>> Cheers, Jim Moritz
>> 73 de M0BMU
>>
>
>
>