Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 18C34380000A2; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:45:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SsERr-0006zG-Ub for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:44:55 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SsERr-0006z7-G9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:44:55 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SsERp-0007Yb-Un for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:44:54 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtIIAJRbCVBcF/+P/2dsb2JhbABFhDCefgOWDIEIghsUAQEDSQIsAggCAQcBHDkBBBoGCBwdAQICAQGIAJ0/oVqLZ4ZFA4gYhUCXdYJf X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,623,1336345200"; d="scan'208,217";a="379674057" Received: from host-92-23-255-143.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.255.143]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 20 Jul 2012 15:44:52 +0100 Message-ID: <006e01cd6686$37bdf860$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: "rsgb" Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:44:50 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: LF It has never been difficult to get a QRS 3 signal into 4X4RF or TF3HZ or Moscow area and even CW. It seems most are bashing away in QRS120 most of the time when QRS 3 would do the trick. I worked UA6LA on CW two way 136.5 Khz March 2005 for the first time. also it is possible to be been seen at TF3HZ during daytime and I have also worked OH1TN many times during the daytime on 136.5 Faster speed are preferable to beat QSB. This is my approach and if it does not work then I slow down if necessary. On 160 metres especially winter time I can work UA9 stns daytime from my QTH and I would say it could likewise be done on 600 metres if anyone in UA9 was available for a QSO. To achive good long haul results on LF es MF good Antennas and sufficient power is essential, this also helps avoid the QSB problem. de G3KEV [...] Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.4 FSL_UA FSL_UA 1.7 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: c0e6e8bcdc231effb9da2003d606d9a2 Subject: LF: 136 DX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_006B_01CD6686.378709E0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:418534080:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db40a50096f1c3348 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_006B_01CD6686.378709E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LF It has never been difficult to get a QRS 3 signal into 4X4RF or TF3HZ = or Moscow area and even CW. It seems most are bashing away in QRS120 most of the time when QRS 3 = would do the trick.=20 I worked UA6LA on CW two way 136.5 Khz March 2005 for the first time. also it is possible to be been seen at TF3HZ during daytime and I have = also worked OH1TN many times during the daytime on 136.5 Faster speed are preferable to beat QSB. This is my approach and if it = does not work then I slow down if necessary. On 160 metres especially winter time I can work UA9 stns daytime from my = QTH and I would say it could likewise be done on 600 metres if anyone in = UA9 was available for a QSO. To achive good long haul results on LF es MF good Antennas and = sufficient power is essential, this also helps avoid the QSB problem. de G3KEV =20 ------=_NextPart_000_006B_01CD6686.378709E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
LF
It has never been difficult to get a QRS = 3 signal=20 into 4X4RF or TF3HZ  or Moscow area and even CW.
It seems most are bashing away in QRS120 most of = the time=20 when QRS 3 would do the trick.
I worked UA6LA on CW two way 136.5 Khz March = 2005 for=20 the first time.
also it is possible to be been seen at = TF3HZ during=20 daytime and I have also worked OH1TN many times during the daytime on=20 136.5
Faster speed are preferable to beat QSB. This is = my=20 approach and if it does not work then I slow down if = necessary.
On 160 metres especially winter time I can work = UA9 stns=20 daytime from my QTH and I would say it could likewise be done on 600 = metres if=20 anyone in UA9 was available for a QSO.
To achive good long haul results on LF es = MF good=20 Antennas and sufficient power is essential, this also helps avoid the = QSB=20 problem.
de G3KEV
 
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_006B_01CD6686.378709E0--