Return-Path: Received: from mtain-di10.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-di10.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.64.14]) by air-mf08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMF081-8bf54bd84d34314; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:59:00 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-di10.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C56193800012E; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:58:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1O78iE-00045R-Kh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:58:06 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1O78iE-00045I-7z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:58:06 +0100 Received: from smtp822.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.232]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1O78iB-0002o3-Sw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:58:06 +0100 Received: (qmail 39545 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2010 14:57:58 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=jo1W/pz/NfsP0rBJb+SEG4XzpEK1r7qDFdzuPid+L2R1HHFYM4Gpc6LKkL6sxE7eE9Dq48VNsrHHc+jGKR5o7HEpxtjODsdebgX1Me345309iMYqMXj11oK+PXf4kZG8i9l986Dmi9ETHn2KxvYplrgmyGDk7wZRns2I7UnzDls= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1272466678; bh=klX038EOtPmBOIZArrYkgEEGwc5aEn/9LGg9ypyKPfM=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=UNed9IiluhhDKyuipiI3ezcugWMyEL0vymYvFjLz7qx/AqMU5z3EKjOlT4Bhc+Y9hHi2KhwDbyQ0jvWXqogxr+DbOwzxGNItBVnByW2++2Bf5pMMIwXrl/M7CkzUZURjmFZHJVvLYH6Pt4PWH5ofR/2caXRms6huDGwEUETte1E= Received: from lark (alan.melia@81.153.0.246 with login) by smtp822.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Apr 2010 07:57:57 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-YMail-OSG: C2aHufsVM1nZqLlNrK3MqBpp81FcbyC933fYtJ.Uit.CMnHyvCPuCmhodw0c1t8TprJoDZx6juUyTwFYlEMtnd7rMFrvsUEqAtGxuWY0z6DlH6SXq_PsswY.GReyrasNKpXkDWpqOsdTn1y8B0GxlbT1e85.AVQqPe_NPjqtP48STNVA7t800Oq49mh2peRi3KThl8j3w1FMIeAmizGjaT11eOCNn8JZ1E3cckcbSmDp5PGh3Sv1eRAE6Ej7VHzZyXHGMarBrBMMcbQkO9Haq7sFwmMOpYcfXKw- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <006e01cae6e3$2d46f4b0$4001a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <003201cae3db$b7ffad50$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g>, Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:57:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1983 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1983 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100428-0, 28/04/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: RE: W1VLF 8.97 KHz UPDATE Trees, Questions, Ground Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m281.1 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d400e4bd84d325377 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Rik ....Reduce the effect of the trees?? How about reducing the voltage on the antenna?? this is effectively what the loopers did on 136 and then hung their loops in the trees. Will it work at 9kHz ?? Probably have to try it to see...... Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rik Strobbe" To: Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:31 PM Subject: LF: RE: W1VLF 8.97 KHz UPDATE Trees, Questions, Ground Hi Paul, Looking here http://rescueelectronics.com/9-Kilohertz.html near the bottom of the page one can see that the tower is backed up by forest. I wondered how much, if any, effect on antenna current running a long radial out in the forest would have? It might increase the loss resistance. It is a kind of trade-off: one the one hand more "area coverage" will reduce the loss resistance (cfr. Laurie's footprint theorie) on the other hand coming close to or even going over any greenry will cause an increase of the loss resistance. If it isn't too much trouble: just try and measure A) Am I just giving the trees a better return path or ground connection (the radial) to the coil??? And the power is being eaten up by the trees??? OR B) Is there a chance this power is actually being radiated, and therefore I should pursuit accumulating these grounds, and their current and return it to the coil?? The only way to avoid that power is "eaten" by the trees is staying way from them (or remove them). Apart from than there is little you can do. Or maybe trow wires over the tree and connect these wires to the ground system (not very practial I'm afraid). But, with or without trees:, the better the ground system (rod's) the more efficient the antenna will be. What is a tree at 9 KHz??? A very lossy capacitor ? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T