Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <006e01c7d464$b6b98c60$a1ebfc3e@g3kev>
From: "hamilton mal" <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <006b01c7d3ba$78370d00$0300a8c0@lark> <1185971099.4593.67.camel@admin>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:51:43 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: 500 Permit Allocation conditions
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

bob om
With your Mummy's permission please let us all know what your professional
electronic communications qualifications happen to be if any before engaging
with your sort of observations I would suggest you do some resarch about the
persons that you are addressing.
Please let me and others know when convenient then I for one could enter
into a proper debate.
I likewise will supply you with my professional credentials.

G3KEV

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Savage" <bobsavage@ukfsn.org>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 500 Permit Allocation conditions


> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:33 +0100, Alan Melia wrote:
>
>
> > One final question why did it matter that it sounded like bedlam in this
> > country today? I though everyone was trying to see whether there signal
> > could be heard in Spain, not in the UK. I havent seen any complaint from
> > Jose-Manual yet !
> >
> > I think some awareness of the nature of this reflector needs to be taken
> > into account, before you let out all your histrionics. You could be
sinking
> > a awfull lot of work by several people to get this allocation at
> > all.....dont mess it up !
> >
> > Cheers de Alan G3NYK
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Well said Alan,
>
> I was very pleased to see three test signals running over here in the
> West yesterday, my experiments with a short AE were greatly enhanced by
> the fact there was some activity on an otherwise barren 501 - 504
> spectrum.  I know for a fact that there are other stations in the West
> who would like to see more test signal activity within this allocation,
> it is most useful during the daytime (I don't do night watches anymore).
> We rely very much on GW3UEP and GW4HXO for these daytime signals for
> test purposes. If you have a decent receiver then a multitude of signals
> in close proximity to each other is not a problem.
>
> The allocation 501 - 504 kHz is for experimentation not for DXCC or
> weekend contest working, but there seems to be a small group of
> unprofessional people on this reflector behaving rather like small boys
> and trying to lay down totally unnecessary rules.  I understand they
> killed a lot of interest in 136kHz by this sort of nonsense.  To them I
> would say "Mummy's calling ....go home and play with your train sets".
> (With apologies to any serious railway enthusiasts).
>
> Bob
>
> GW3LTX
>
>
>
>