Return-Path: Received: from mtain-md08.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-md08.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.92]) by air-mf01.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMF013-8bcb4cc35c611f; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:06:25 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md08.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9738D38000097; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:06:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P9mBc-0001nJ-Oj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:03:36 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P9mBc-0001nA-3I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:03:36 +0100 Received: from smtp824.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.234]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P9mBa-0004AT-EP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2010 23:03:36 +0100 Received: (qmail 68183 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2010 22:03:28 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=km/nbEkwSC4cOso/wFmbBQ2iH1KZPtqGcitQoMpOkUlqTpsPMEq47U5dg8RBttVYHtu8m6pqAYqe1TrkwsJ2RocfVzEagnTBhPXf60a8MOwxClL0VfumHwlMzuwtSrnrv0T5tOJr1OfElytePkBayTmDTpCDXjnKHYXB7EzhwtU= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1287871408; bh=a8ZMTlzBsL9lz7mxmjxt8ubQ+O0WBNTapqtuByVphyc=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=AcnJuXjlh7yt8hKSUyqCdfbySxbXJE3/Np/MJ2Hr5kGaTDZzAPZYzVJZo5rN239kF/ebrY6vMxQdWOXcAZS4B8+PdF/8ZbLIoYb/3Wv7ltBhfYWOo/2vviG/jGdYFsFnU2KYKhFslgSNyfDBwZpbmb+tmbFbOkU47wsb9VLtphY= Received: from lark (alan.melia@86.157.30.157 with login) by smtp824.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Oct 2010 15:03:28 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-YMail-OSG: cmW0D6kVM1l2Ixkx_uamRUxBXXyzsEMyvhSxueVa5yoi127 PFoUBRF.9n83DvMYDqgmOrkV0AnEA2Ue1j2ZKlhN_ZU4jrzskoLwzMVhixWY P8nU6i.kqx.qwpAQCxXCOHrzDaJM4hBAMWtX1R8vhFDRl0qNy4C1riXX1aT0 4bb2MYp4312pOdrgLhM.F3u.jtj1DP_xL6pQAl6543vLbUc7FJInAWbJ2vzP gGPS_FJz66EwZskSAttd4DcoTmVBG46L5jEetfDRNLeIn0L6R.3raSOQp8.g VOflM9SYt X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <006b01cb72fe$23473540$4001a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: "RSGB LF Gp" References: Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 22:32:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.2001 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.2001 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 101023-1, 23/10/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d245.2 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d605c4cc35c5f4484 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none In theory, if you communicate, yes! They reserve the right to make the decision to approve, and laser comms are under their "regulation" Alan ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 9:09 AM Subject: RE: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > So you need permission to switch on a light??? > > 73 > > Victor > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]Namens Alan Melia > Verzonden: vrijdag 22 oktober 2010 22:14 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > > > No a good idea Jacek Ofcoms regulatory powers do not end at 9kHz. They have > powers over radiation at any frequency. > Alan G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jacek Lipkowski" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 8:45 PM > Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today > > > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > > > > > *Frequencies allowed:* 8.7kHz - 9.1kHz > > > > i wonder what would happen if you applied specifically for 8.0-8.990kHz > > (no frequency >9kHz). is expanding the frequency range above 9kHz a trick > > by OFCOM, so that they can show that they have juristiction? > > > > VY 73 > > > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > > > > > > >